@floating-ui/react vs antd vs @chakra-ui/react
UI Component Libraries Comparison
1 Year
@floating-ui/reactantd@chakra-ui/reactSimilar Packages:
What's UI Component Libraries?

UI component libraries are collections of pre-built components that facilitate the development of user interfaces in web applications. They provide developers with ready-to-use components that adhere to design principles, allowing for faster development, consistency in design, and improved user experience. These libraries often come with customizable themes and responsive designs, making it easier to create visually appealing and functional applications without starting from scratch.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
@floating-ui/react5,262,31531,196928 kB273 days agoMIT
antd1,800,89194,77948.3 MB1,3233 days agoMIT
@chakra-ui/react807,50439,1622.13 MB1112 days agoMIT
Feature Comparison: @floating-ui/react vs antd vs @chakra-ui/react

Design Consistency

  • @floating-ui/react:

    Floating UI does not focus on design consistency as it primarily deals with positioning elements. It is meant to enhance the user experience by ensuring that tooltips and popovers are displayed correctly, regardless of the design framework used.

  • antd:

    Ant Design is built around a design system that ensures consistency across all components. It provides a comprehensive set of design guidelines and pre-built components that adhere to these standards, making it easy to maintain a consistent user interface.

  • @chakra-ui/react:

    Chakra UI emphasizes design consistency through its modular component system, which allows developers to create a cohesive look and feel across applications. It provides a set of design tokens and a theme provider to maintain uniformity in styles.

Accessibility

  • @floating-ui/react:

    Floating UI does not directly address accessibility as it focuses on positioning. However, developers must ensure that any tooltips or popovers created with it are accessible by following best practices for ARIA roles and attributes.

  • antd:

    Ant Design includes accessibility features in its components, but developers need to be mindful of implementing them correctly. While many components are designed with accessibility in mind, additional effort may be required to ensure full compliance.

  • @chakra-ui/react:

    Chakra UI is built with accessibility in mind, providing components that are compliant with WAI-ARIA standards. It ensures that all users, including those with disabilities, can navigate and interact with applications seamlessly.

Customization

  • @floating-ui/react:

    Customization in Floating UI is limited to the positioning and behavior of elements. It allows developers to define how tooltips and popovers behave but does not provide styling options, as it is primarily a utility for positioning.

  • antd:

    Ant Design provides a theming capability that allows for some level of customization. However, it is more opinionated in its design, which may limit extensive customization compared to Chakra UI.

  • @chakra-ui/react:

    Chakra UI offers extensive customization options through its theme provider, allowing developers to easily adjust styles, colors, and component behavior. This flexibility makes it suitable for projects that require a unique branding experience.

Component Variety

  • @floating-ui/react:

    Floating UI focuses solely on positioning and does not provide UI components. It is a utility library that enhances existing components by managing their positioning dynamically based on user interactions.

  • antd:

    Ant Design boasts a comprehensive set of components tailored for enterprise applications. It includes a rich variety of components, from basic UI elements to complex data visualization tools, making it a robust choice for large applications.

  • @chakra-ui/react:

    Chakra UI offers a wide range of components that are simple to use and integrate. It includes basic UI elements like buttons and forms, as well as more complex components like modals and tooltips, all designed for rapid development.

Learning Curve

  • @floating-ui/react:

    Floating UI has a moderate learning curve as it requires understanding of positioning concepts and how to integrate it with existing components. Developers need to be comfortable with dynamic positioning logic.

  • antd:

    Ant Design has a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive nature and the breadth of components available. Developers may need time to familiarize themselves with its design principles and component usage.

  • @chakra-ui/react:

    Chakra UI has a gentle learning curve, especially for developers familiar with React. Its straightforward API and documentation make it easy to get started and build applications quickly.

How to Choose: @floating-ui/react vs antd vs @chakra-ui/react
  • @floating-ui/react:

    Select Floating UI if your project requires advanced positioning and tooltip management. It is ideal for applications that need dynamic positioning of elements based on user interactions, such as dropdowns and popovers.

  • antd:

    Opt for Ant Design if you are building enterprise-level applications that require a comprehensive set of high-quality components. Ant Design provides a rich set of features and a design language that aligns well with business applications.

  • @chakra-ui/react:

    Choose Chakra UI if you prioritize accessibility, modularity, and a simple API. It is particularly suited for projects that require a consistent design system and easy customization through a theme provider.

README for @floating-ui/react

@floating-ui/react

This is the library to use Floating UI with React.