slate vs draft-js vs @lexical/rich-text
Rich Text Editors for Web Development Comparison
Search packages..
1 Year
slatedraft-js@lexical/rich-textSimilar Packages:
What's Rich Text Editors for Web Development?

Rich text editors are essential tools in web development that allow users to create and format text content in a user-friendly manner. These libraries provide a range of features that enable developers to implement text editing functionalities with varying levels of complexity and customization. The choice of a rich text editor can significantly impact the user experience and the ease of integration into web applications, making it crucial to understand the strengths and weaknesses of each library.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
slate1,025,76830,4032.12 MB6843 months agoMIT
draft-js820,41922,581-9555 years agoMIT
@lexical/rich-text652,32120,61389.2 kB5124 days agoMIT
Feature Comparison: slate vs draft-js vs @lexical/rich-text

Customization

  • slate:

    Slate is designed with customization in mind, allowing developers to create entirely new editing experiences. Its plugin system enables deep customization of the editor's behavior and appearance, making it suitable for applications with specific requirements.

  • draft-js:

    Draft.js provides a set of built-in components and APIs for customization, but it may require more effort to implement advanced features. It is flexible enough for most use cases but can become complex for highly specialized needs.

  • @lexical/rich-text:

    @lexical/rich-text offers a highly modular architecture that allows developers to create custom nodes and plugins, enabling a tailored editing experience. Its design encourages the creation of unique features while maintaining performance and responsiveness.

Performance

  • slate:

    Slate's performance can vary based on the complexity of the editor and the number of plugins used. While it can handle large documents, developers must be mindful of performance implications when adding numerous features.

  • draft-js:

    Draft.js is generally performant but can experience slowdowns with large documents due to its reliance on immutable data structures. Developers may need to implement optimizations for very large content sizes.

  • @lexical/rich-text:

    @lexical/rich-text is optimized for performance, utilizing a virtual DOM and efficient rendering strategies that minimize re-renders and improve responsiveness, making it suitable for applications with heavy text editing demands.

Learning Curve

  • slate:

    Slate has a higher learning curve compared to the others, primarily due to its flexibility and the need for developers to define their own editor behavior. This can be daunting for beginners but rewarding for those needing custom solutions.

  • draft-js:

    Draft.js has a steeper learning curve due to its complex state management and the need to understand its data model. However, once mastered, it offers a powerful set of features for rich text editing.

  • @lexical/rich-text:

    @lexical/rich-text has a moderate learning curve, especially for developers familiar with React. Its API is designed to be intuitive, but understanding its modular approach may take some time for newcomers.

Community and Support

  • slate:

    Slate has an active community and good documentation, but being highly customizable means that developers may encounter unique challenges that require more bespoke solutions.

  • draft-js:

    Draft.js has a well-established community and extensive documentation, making it easier to find solutions and support. Its maturity means many common issues have been addressed by the community.

  • @lexical/rich-text:

    @lexical/rich-text is relatively new but is backed by a growing community and active development. Documentation is clear, and resources are becoming more available as adoption increases.

Integration

  • slate:

    Slate's flexibility allows it to be integrated into various frameworks, but it is primarily used with React. Its architecture allows for easy integration into different environments, but developers may need to handle more setup.

  • draft-js:

    Draft.js is also designed for React, providing seamless integration with React components. Its API is tailored for React, making it a natural choice for React-based projects.

  • @lexical/rich-text:

    @lexical/rich-text is built specifically for React, making it easy to integrate into React applications. It leverages React's component model effectively, ensuring a smooth developer experience.

How to Choose: slate vs draft-js vs @lexical/rich-text
  • slate:

    Choose Slate if you need a highly customizable editor that allows for complex content structures and rich interactions. It provides a powerful plugin architecture, making it ideal for applications that require unique editing experiences or specific content types.

  • draft-js:

    Choose Draft.js if you are looking for a mature, battle-tested solution that integrates seamlessly with React. It is particularly suitable for applications that require a strong focus on content management and rich text features, with a solid community and documentation.

  • @lexical/rich-text:

    Choose @lexical/rich-text if you need a modern, highly customizable rich text editor that emphasizes performance and extensibility. It is designed for React applications and provides a flexible API for building complex text editing experiences.

Similar Npm Packages to slate

slate is a highly customizable framework for building rich text editors in React applications. It provides a powerful and flexible API that allows developers to create complex editing experiences tailored to their specific needs. With features like collaborative editing, custom formatting, and extensibility, slate is an excellent choice for applications that require advanced text editing capabilities.

One notable alternative to slate is draft-js. Developed by Facebook, draft-js is another framework for building rich text editors in React. It offers a set of tools for managing content state and handling user input, making it easier to create text editing experiences. While draft-js provides a robust foundation for building editors, it may be less flexible than slate when it comes to customization and extending functionality.

Both libraries have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them often depends on the specific requirements of the project. If you need a highly customizable and extensible editor, slate might be the better option. On the other hand, if you prefer a more straightforward approach with solid support from a well-established library, draft-js could be the way to go.

To see how slate compares with draft-js, check out the comparison: Comparing draft-js vs slate.

Similar Npm Packages to draft-js

draft-js is a rich text editor framework for React applications, developed by Facebook. It provides a set of tools to create complex text editing experiences while maintaining the flexibility to customize the editor's behavior and appearance. With its powerful API, draft-js allows developers to manage the content state, handle text input, and implement features like text formatting, undo/redo functionality, and more. It is particularly well-suited for applications that require a rich text editing experience, such as blogging platforms, content management systems, or collaborative editing tools.

One notable alternative to draft-js is react-draft-wysiwyg. This library builds on top of draft-js to provide a more user-friendly, WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editor experience. With react-draft-wysiwyg, developers can easily integrate a rich text editor into their applications with minimal configuration. It offers a variety of built-in features, such as toolbar options for text formatting, image uploads, and more, making it an excellent choice for those who want a ready-to-use solution without the need for extensive customization.

For a detailed comparison of these two packages, check out the following link: Comparing draft-js vs react-draft-wysiwyg.

Similar Npm Packages to @lexical/rich-text

@lexical/rich-text is a powerful rich text editor library designed for React applications. It provides a flexible and extensible framework for building rich text editing experiences, allowing developers to create custom editing interfaces with ease. With its focus on performance and user experience, @lexical/rich-text is an excellent choice for applications that require sophisticated text editing capabilities.

While @lexical/rich-text offers a robust solution, there are other libraries in the React ecosystem that also provide rich text editing features. Here are a few alternatives:

  • draft-js is a rich text editor framework developed by Facebook. It allows developers to create complex text editing experiences with a focus on performance and extensibility. Draft.js provides a set of APIs to manage content state, handle input events, and customize the editor's behavior. It is particularly well-suited for applications that require a high degree of customization and control over the text editing experience. However, it may have a steeper learning curve compared to other libraries, making it more suitable for developers who need advanced features.
  • slate is another highly customizable rich text editor framework that provides a flexible API for building rich text editing experiences. It allows developers to create complex editing interfaces with features like collaborative editing, custom formatting, and more. Slate's architecture is designed to be extensible, enabling developers to create their own plugins and components to enhance the editing experience. If you need a rich text editor that can be tailored to specific requirements and offers a high level of customization, Slate is a strong contender.

To see how @lexical/rich-text compares with draft-js and slate, check out the comparison: Comparing @lexical/rich-text vs draft-js vs slate.

README for slate

This package contains the core logic of Slate. Feel free to poke around to learn more!

Note: A number of source files contain extracted types for Interfaces or Transforms. This is done currently to enable custom type extensions as found in packages/src/interfaces/custom-types.ts.

npm-compare.com is an independent website designed to help developers choose the most suitable npm packages. We are not affiliated with npm, Inc or npmjs.com, the official website for the npm registry. Please note that npm is a registered trademark of npm, Inc. For more details, please refer to our Terms & Privacy.