jest vs chai vs mocha vs supertest vs jasmine vs ava vs tap vs qunit
JavaScript Testing Frameworks Comparison
1 Year
jestchaimochasupertestjasmineavatapqunitSimilar Packages:
What's JavaScript Testing Frameworks?

JavaScript testing frameworks are tools designed to facilitate the process of writing and executing tests for JavaScript applications. They provide a structured way to ensure that code behaves as expected, helping developers catch bugs early in the development process. These frameworks support various testing methodologies, including unit testing, integration testing, and end-to-end testing, and often come with features like assertions, mocking, and test runners to streamline the testing workflow.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
jest34,557,89844,8766.32 kB2605 days agoMIT
chai23,482,6968,224515 kB895 months agoMIT
mocha13,689,55122,7962.31 MB21713 days agoMIT
supertest7,462,76614,08124.3 kB1822 months agoMIT
jasmine1,644,70438183.8 kB0a month agoMIT
ava700,53720,796289 kB59a month agoMIT
tap676,9872,38980.2 kB395 months agoBlueOak-1.0.0
qunit406,7394,020309 kB475 months agoMIT
Feature Comparison: jest vs chai vs mocha vs supertest vs jasmine vs ava vs tap vs qunit

Test Execution

  • jest:

    Jest runs tests in parallel and includes a built-in test runner, making it easy to manage and execute tests. It also supports snapshot testing, which allows you to track changes in your UI components over time.

  • chai:

    Chai does not execute tests by itself; it is an assertion library that can be used with other frameworks like Mocha or Jasmine. It provides a variety of assertion styles to enhance readability and expressiveness.

  • mocha:

    Mocha allows you to run tests sequentially or in parallel, depending on your configuration. It provides flexibility in structuring tests and supports asynchronous testing with callbacks or promises.

  • supertest:

    Supertest is designed specifically for testing HTTP requests and responses, allowing you to easily make assertions about your API endpoints. It integrates seamlessly with any testing framework.

  • jasmine:

    Jasmine runs tests synchronously by default, which can be beneficial for simpler test cases. It provides a clean syntax for writing tests and comes with built-in support for spies and mocks.

  • ava:

    Ava runs tests concurrently, which can significantly speed up the execution time, especially for large test suites. It uses a simple and minimalistic syntax, making it easy to write tests quickly.

  • tap:

    Tap runs tests sequentially and outputs results in the TAP format, which is useful for integration with other tools that support TAP. It is minimalistic and focuses on simplicity.

  • qunit:

    QUnit executes tests synchronously, which is straightforward for unit testing but may not be ideal for larger test suites. It is easy to set up and integrates well with jQuery projects.

Assertions

  • jest:

    Jest provides a comprehensive set of matchers for assertions, including support for mocking and spying. Its syntax is intuitive and integrates well with the overall testing framework, promoting a seamless testing experience.

  • chai:

    Chai offers a rich set of assertions with multiple styles (should, expect, assert), allowing developers to choose the most expressive way to write their tests. This flexibility enhances readability and maintainability.

  • mocha:

    Mocha does not include an assertion library by default, allowing you to choose your preferred library (like Chai) for assertions. This flexibility lets you customize your testing setup according to your needs.

  • supertest:

    Supertest allows you to make assertions about HTTP responses, such as status codes, headers, and response bodies. It simplifies the process of testing APIs by providing a fluent interface for making requests and asserting responses.

  • jasmine:

    Jasmine comes with built-in matchers for assertions, making it easy to write tests without needing additional libraries. The syntax is clear and encourages a BDD approach to testing.

  • ava:

    Ava provides a simple assertion API that supports async/await, making it easy to write tests for asynchronous code. The assertions are straightforward and focus on clarity.

  • tap:

    Tap provides a minimalistic assertion API that focuses on simplicity and clarity. It outputs results in the TAP format, which is useful for integration with other tools.

  • qunit:

    QUnit provides a simple assertion API that is easy to use for unit testing. It focuses on clarity and simplicity, making it accessible for developers of all skill levels.

Mocking and Spying

  • jest:

    Jest includes a powerful mocking library that allows you to mock functions, modules, and timers. This makes it easy to isolate tests and simulate different scenarios without relying on actual implementations.

  • chai:

    Chai does not provide mocking functionality, but it can be easily integrated with Sinon or other libraries to create spies and mocks, enhancing its testing capabilities.

  • mocha:

    Mocha does not include built-in mocking capabilities, but it can be used with libraries like Sinon for creating mocks and spies. This allows for flexible testing setups based on your requirements.

  • supertest:

    Supertest does not provide mocking capabilities, as it is focused on testing HTTP requests. However, it can be used alongside other libraries for mocking server responses during tests.

  • jasmine:

    Jasmine has built-in support for spies, allowing you to easily create mock functions and track calls to them. This feature is particularly useful for testing interactions between components.

  • ava:

    Ava does not include built-in mocking capabilities, but it works well with other libraries like Sinon for creating mocks and spies. This allows for flexible testing of asynchronous code.

  • tap:

    Tap does not include built-in mocking capabilities, but it can be used with other libraries to create mocks and spies, allowing for flexible testing setups.

  • qunit:

    QUnit does not provide built-in mocking capabilities, but it can be integrated with other libraries for mocking and spying. This allows you to create more complex test scenarios if needed.

Community and Ecosystem

  • jest:

    Jest has a rapidly growing community, especially among React developers. Its all-in-one approach and extensive features have made it a popular choice for modern JavaScript applications.

  • chai:

    Chai has a large community and is widely used in conjunction with Mocha and other frameworks. Its flexibility and variety of assertion styles make it a popular choice among developers.

  • mocha:

    Mocha has a large and active community, with many plugins and integrations available. Its flexibility allows developers to customize their testing environment according to their needs.

  • supertest:

    Supertest is widely used in the Node.js community for testing APIs. It is well-documented and integrates seamlessly with various testing frameworks, making it a popular choice for HTTP testing.

  • jasmine:

    Jasmine has been around for a long time and has a strong community. It is a well-established framework with extensive documentation and resources available for developers.

  • ava:

    Ava has a growing community and ecosystem, but it is not as large as some of the more established frameworks. It is well-documented and has a focus on modern JavaScript features.

  • tap:

    Tap has a smaller community but is appreciated for its simplicity and adherence to the TAP format. It is suitable for projects that value minimalism and straightforward testing.

  • qunit:

    QUnit has a smaller community compared to other frameworks, but it is well-supported for jQuery projects. It is straightforward and easy to use, making it accessible for beginners.

Learning Curve

  • jest:

    Jest is designed to be easy to set up and use, with a gentle learning curve. Its comprehensive documentation and built-in features help developers get started quickly, especially in React projects.

  • chai:

    Chai is easy to learn, especially for developers who are already familiar with Mocha or other testing frameworks. Its flexible assertion styles allow for a smooth learning experience.

  • mocha:

    Mocha has a moderate learning curve, as it requires you to choose your assertion library and mocking tools. However, its flexibility allows for a customized testing experience that can be tailored to your needs.

  • supertest:

    Supertest is easy to learn, especially for developers familiar with testing HTTP servers. Its fluent interface simplifies the process of making requests and asserting responses.

  • jasmine:

    Jasmine has a moderate learning curve, with a focus on BDD principles. Its built-in features make it easy to write tests, but understanding its conventions may take some time for newcomers.

  • ava:

    Ava has a relatively low learning curve, especially for developers familiar with modern JavaScript features like async/await. Its minimalistic syntax makes it easy to get started quickly.

  • tap:

    Tap has a low learning curve due to its minimalistic approach. Its focus on simplicity makes it easy for developers to write tests without getting bogged down in complex configurations.

  • qunit:

    QUnit has a low learning curve, making it accessible for beginners. Its straightforward syntax and focus on unit testing make it easy to write and understand tests.

How to Choose: jest vs chai vs mocha vs supertest vs jasmine vs ava vs tap vs qunit
  • jest:

    Choose Jest for its all-in-one testing solution, especially if you are working with React applications. Jest provides a powerful mocking library, snapshot testing, and a simple configuration, making it suitable for large applications that need efficient testing.

  • chai:

    Select Chai if you need a flexible assertion library that can be used with any testing framework. Chai offers a variety of assertion styles (should, expect, assert) and is ideal for projects that require expressive and readable test assertions.

  • mocha:

    Select Mocha if you want a flexible and feature-rich testing framework that allows you to choose your assertion library and mocking tools. Mocha is ideal for projects that require a customizable testing environment and support for asynchronous testing.

  • supertest:

    Choose Supertest if you need to test HTTP servers and APIs. It provides a high-level abstraction for testing HTTP requests, making it ideal for projects that involve RESTful services and require integration testing.

  • jasmine:

    Opt for Jasmine if you want a behavior-driven development (BDD) framework that comes with built-in assertion and mocking capabilities. Jasmine is great for projects that require a comprehensive solution without external dependencies.

  • ava:

    Choose Ava if you prefer a minimalistic testing framework that runs tests concurrently, providing faster execution times. It is particularly useful for projects that require a modern approach with support for async/await and a clean syntax.

  • tap:

    Select Tap if you prefer a simple and minimalistic testing framework with a focus on TAP (Test Anything Protocol) output. Tap is suitable for projects that require a straightforward approach to testing with less overhead.

  • qunit:

    Opt for QUnit if you are working on jQuery projects or need a straightforward testing framework for unit tests. QUnit is lightweight and easy to set up, making it suitable for small to medium-sized projects.

README for jest

Jest

🃏 Delightful JavaScript Testing

  • 👩🏻‍💻 Developer Ready: Complete and ready to set-up JavaScript testing solution. Works out of the box for any React project.

  • 🏃🏽 Instant Feedback: Failed tests run first. Fast interactive mode can switch between running all tests or only test files related to changed files.

  • 📸 Snapshot Testing: Jest can capture snapshots of React trees or other serializable values to simplify UI testing.

Read More: https://jestjs.io/