pnpm vs npm vs yarn vs bun
JavaScript Package Managers Comparison
1 Year
pnpmnpmyarnbunSimilar Packages:
What's JavaScript Package Managers?

JavaScript package managers are essential tools in web development that help manage project dependencies, automate tasks, and streamline the development workflow. They allow developers to easily install, update, and manage libraries and frameworks, ensuring that projects are built with the correct versions of dependencies. Each package manager has its unique features and optimizations, catering to different development needs and preferences, thus influencing the overall efficiency and performance of the development process.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
pnpm20,993,60930,91118.7 MB1,7875 days agoMIT
npm6,254,0938,71411.8 MB666a month agoArtistic-2.0
yarn5,830,79641,5055.34 MB2,067a year agoBSD-2-Clause
bun238,45076,53318 kB4,4555 days agoMIT
Feature Comparison: pnpm vs npm vs yarn vs bun

Performance

  • pnpm:

    pnpm excels in performance by using a unique symlink strategy, allowing it to install packages faster and use less disk space. It avoids duplication of dependencies, which can lead to quicker installations and reduced overhead in large projects.

  • npm:

    npm is reliable but can be slower than other package managers, especially with large projects. It has improved performance over the years, but its traditional approach to dependency resolution can lead to longer install times compared to newer alternatives.

  • yarn:

    Yarn is known for its speed, especially with its caching mechanism that allows for faster installations. It parallelizes operations to enhance performance, making it a good choice for projects that require quick dependency management.

  • bun:

    Bun is designed for speed, boasting a fast JavaScript engine and optimized package management. It significantly reduces installation times and improves overall performance, making it ideal for modern web applications that require quick builds and deployments.

Dependency Management

  • pnpm:

    pnpm's unique approach to dependency management prevents version conflicts by using a single version of each package across projects. This ensures consistency and reduces the likelihood of issues arising from conflicting dependencies.

  • npm:

    npm has a straightforward dependency management system that is widely understood and used. It allows for easy installation, updating, and removal of packages, but can sometimes lead to version conflicts if not managed carefully.

  • yarn:

    Yarn provides a robust dependency management system with its lockfile feature, ensuring that installations are consistent across different environments. It also supports workspaces, making it easier to manage multiple packages within a single repository.

  • bun:

    Bun offers a modern approach to dependency management, integrating features like automatic dependency resolution and a streamlined workflow. It simplifies the process of managing dependencies, making it easier for developers to keep their projects up to date.

Community and Ecosystem

  • pnpm:

    pnpm is gaining popularity and has a strong community focused on performance and efficiency. While its ecosystem is smaller than npm's, it is growing rapidly as more developers recognize its advantages.

  • npm:

    npm has the largest ecosystem of packages available, with millions of libraries and tools. Its widespread adoption means that developers can find extensive community support and resources for troubleshooting and learning.

  • yarn:

    Yarn has a strong community and is widely adopted in the JavaScript ecosystem. It has a rich set of plugins and integrations, making it a popular choice among developers for managing dependencies.

  • bun:

    Bun is relatively new and still growing its community and ecosystem. While it offers innovative features, it may not have as extensive a library of packages and community support as more established tools.

Ease of Use

  • pnpm:

    pnpm has a slightly steeper learning curve due to its unique approach to dependency management. However, once understood, it offers powerful features that can greatly enhance the development experience.

  • npm:

    npm is straightforward to use, especially for those familiar with Node.js. Its command-line interface is well-documented, making it easy for developers to get started with package management.

  • yarn:

    Yarn is known for its user-friendly interface and clear documentation. It provides helpful commands and options that simplify the process of managing dependencies, making it accessible for developers of all skill levels.

  • bun:

    Bun is designed to be user-friendly with a simple command-line interface and intuitive features. Its modern design makes it easy for developers to adopt and integrate into their workflows without a steep learning curve.

Lockfile Management

  • pnpm:

    pnpm uses a lockfile to manage dependencies, ensuring that the exact versions of packages are installed. This helps prevent issues related to version mismatches and enhances project stability.

  • npm:

    npm uses a package-lock.json file to lock down the versions of dependencies, ensuring that installations are reproducible. This is a critical feature for maintaining stability in projects.

  • yarn:

    Yarn's lockfile feature is one of its standout characteristics, providing a reliable way to manage dependencies and ensuring that all team members have the same package versions installed.

  • bun:

    Bun supports lockfile management to ensure consistent installations across environments, but its implementation is still evolving as it matures.

How to Choose: pnpm vs npm vs yarn vs bun
  • pnpm:

    Choose pnpm if you want a fast and efficient package manager that uses a unique symlink strategy to save disk space and improve installation speed. It's particularly beneficial for monorepos and projects with many dependencies, as it avoids duplication of packages.

  • npm:

    Choose npm if you need a widely adopted and robust package manager that comes pre-installed with Node.js. It is suitable for projects that require a vast ecosystem of packages and tools, and you value stability and community support.

  • yarn:

    Choose Yarn if you prefer a package manager that emphasizes speed, reliability, and security. Yarn's offline capabilities and lockfile feature provide a consistent installation experience across different environments, making it suitable for collaborative projects.

  • bun:

    Choose Bun if you are looking for a modern, fast, and efficient JavaScript runtime that integrates package management, bundling, and transpilation in one tool. It's ideal for projects that prioritize performance and want to leverage the latest advancements in JavaScript tooling.

README for pnpm

简体中文 | 日本語 | 한국어 | Italiano | Português Brasileiro

pnpm

Fast, disk space efficient package manager:

  • Fast. Up to 2x faster than the alternatives (see benchmark).
  • Efficient. Files inside node_modules are linked from a single content-addressable storage.
  • Great for monorepos.
  • Strict. A package can access only dependencies that are specified in its package.json.
  • Deterministic. Has a lockfile called pnpm-lock.yaml.
  • Works as a Node.js version manager. See pnpm env use.
  • Works everywhere. Supports Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Battle-tested. Used in production by teams of all sizes since 2016.
  • See the full feature comparison with npm and Yarn.

To quote the Rush team:

Microsoft uses pnpm in Rush repos with hundreds of projects and hundreds of PRs per day, and we’ve found it to be very fast and reliable.

npm version Join the chat at Discord OpenCollective OpenCollective X Follow Stand With Ukraine

Platinum Sponsors

Bit Bit

Gold Sponsors

Discord u|screen
JetBrains Nx
CodeRabbit Route4Me
Workleap

Silver Sponsors

Leniolabs_ Vercel Depot
moonrepo devowl.io Cerbos
vlt Vite
Vite

Support this project by becoming a sponsor.

Background

pnpm uses a content-addressable filesystem to store all files from all module directories on a disk. When using npm, if you have 100 projects using lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be stored in a content-addressable storage, so:

  1. If you depend on different versions of lodash, only the files that differ are added to the store. If lodash has 100 files, and a new version has a change only in one of those files, pnpm update will only add 1 new file to the storage.
  2. All the files are saved in a single place on the disk. When packages are installed, their files are linked from that single place consuming no additional disk space. Linking is performed using either hard-links or reflinks (copy-on-write).

As a result, you save gigabytes of space on your disk and you have a lot faster installations! If you'd like more details about the unique node_modules structure that pnpm creates and why it works fine with the Node.js ecosystem, read this small article: Flat node_modules is not the only way.

💖 Like this project? Let people know with a tweet

Installation

For installation options visit our website.

Usage

Just use pnpm in place of npm/Yarn. E.g., install dependencies via:

pnpm install

For more advanced usage, read pnpm CLI on our website, or run pnpm help.

Benchmark

pnpm is up to 2x faster than npm and Yarn classic. See all benchmarks here.

Benchmarks on an app with lots of dependencies:

Support

License

MIT