pnpm vs npm vs yarn vs npm-check-updates vs bower vs jspm
JavaScript Package Management Tools Comparison
1 Year
pnpmnpmyarnnpm-check-updatesbowerjspmSimilar Packages:
What's JavaScript Package Management Tools?

JavaScript package management tools are essential for managing libraries and dependencies in web development projects. They facilitate the installation, updating, and configuration of packages, helping developers maintain their projects efficiently. Each tool offers unique features, workflows, and optimizations that cater to different development needs, from simple projects to complex applications. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each package manager can significantly enhance the development process and improve project maintainability.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
pnpm21,089,55730,93318.7 MB1,7937 days agoMIT
npm6,237,1428,71611.8 MB657a month agoArtistic-2.0
yarn5,760,88941,5075.34 MB2,066a year agoBSD-2-Clause
npm-check-updates471,0599,6515.3 MB7710 days agoApache-2.0
bower345,185-20 MB--MIT
jspm8,046-1.02 MB-a month agoApache-2.0
Feature Comparison: pnpm vs npm vs yarn vs npm-check-updates vs bower vs jspm

Installation Speed

  • pnpm:

    pnpm is known for its speed due to its unique symlink approach, which minimizes disk space usage and speeds up installations.

  • npm:

    npm has improved its installation speed significantly with recent updates, but it can still be slower than some alternatives due to its flat dependency structure.

  • yarn:

    Yarn is designed for speed, utilizing caching and parallel installations to reduce the time it takes to install dependencies.

  • npm-check-updates:

    npm-check-updates does not manage installations directly but speeds up the process of updating dependencies by automating version checks.

  • bower:

    Bower is relatively fast for installing front-end libraries, but it lacks the optimizations found in modern package managers.

  • jspm:

    JSPM offers fast installations by leveraging the SystemJS loader, which allows for efficient module loading and caching.

Dependency Management

  • pnpm:

    pnpm's unique approach to dependency management reduces duplication and ensures that packages are installed efficiently, making it ideal for large projects.

  • npm:

    npm is the most comprehensive package manager, handling both front-end and back-end dependencies seamlessly, with a vast registry of packages available.

  • yarn:

    Yarn offers a robust dependency management system with a lockfile feature that ensures consistent installations across environments.

  • npm-check-updates:

    npm-check-updates specializes in updating dependencies but does not manage them directly; it works alongside npm to enhance dependency management.

  • bower:

    Bower focuses on front-end dependencies and provides a simple way to manage them, but it is less effective for back-end packages.

  • jspm:

    JSPM excels in managing both front-end and back-end dependencies, especially with ES6 modules, making it versatile for modern applications.

Community and Ecosystem

  • pnpm:

    pnpm is gaining traction and has a growing community, especially among developers looking for efficient package management solutions.

  • npm:

    npm has the largest community and ecosystem, with millions of packages available, making it the most widely used package manager in JavaScript.

  • yarn:

    Yarn has a strong community and is widely adopted, especially in projects that prioritize speed and reliability.

  • npm-check-updates:

    npm-check-updates is a smaller tool with a focused purpose, but it is widely used within the npm ecosystem for managing updates.

  • bower:

    Bower has seen a decline in popularity and community support as newer tools have emerged, making it less favorable for new projects.

  • jspm:

    JSPM has a smaller community compared to npm and Yarn but is growing as more developers adopt ES6 modules and modern JavaScript practices.

Configuration and Customization

  • pnpm:

    pnpm offers configuration options that allow developers to customize the installation process and optimize package management for their specific needs.

  • npm:

    npm provides a flexible configuration system through the package.json file, allowing for various scripts and settings to be defined for projects.

  • yarn:

    Yarn provides a rich configuration system, including workspaces for monorepos, making it highly customizable for different project structures.

  • npm-check-updates:

    npm-check-updates has minimal configuration options, focusing primarily on updating dependencies rather than managing them.

  • bower:

    Bower's configuration is straightforward, but it lacks the advanced customization options found in other package managers.

  • jspm:

    JSPM allows for extensive configuration and customization, particularly for module loading and package management, making it suitable for complex applications.

Ease of Use

  • pnpm:

    pnpm is easy to use, especially for developers already familiar with npm, but its unique approach may require some adjustment.

  • npm:

    npm is user-friendly and widely documented, making it accessible for developers of all skill levels.

  • yarn:

    Yarn is designed for ease of use, with a simple command-line interface and clear documentation, making it accessible for developers.

  • npm-check-updates:

    npm-check-updates is straightforward to use, especially for developers familiar with npm, as it integrates seamlessly with existing workflows.

  • bower:

    Bower is easy to use for front-end projects, but its simplicity can be limiting for more complex applications.

  • jspm:

    JSPM has a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features and configurations, which may be challenging for beginners.

How to Choose: pnpm vs npm vs yarn vs npm-check-updates vs bower vs jspm
  • pnpm:

    Choose pnpm if you need a fast and efficient package manager that uses a unique symlink strategy to save disk space. pnpm is particularly beneficial for monorepos and projects with many dependencies, as it reduces duplication and speeds up installations.

  • npm:

    Use npm if you are looking for the most widely adopted package manager in the JavaScript ecosystem. It is suitable for both front-end and back-end projects and provides a vast registry of packages. npm is also integrated with Node.js, making it a go-to choice for server-side applications.

  • yarn:

    Select Yarn if you prefer a package manager that emphasizes speed and reliability. Yarn caches every package it downloads, which makes subsequent installations faster. It also provides a lockfile feature that ensures consistent installations across different environments.

  • npm-check-updates:

    Opt for npm-check-updates if you want to easily manage and upgrade your package dependencies. It allows you to check for updates to your dependencies and can help keep your project up-to-date without manually editing the package.json file.

  • bower:

    Choose Bower if you are working on a project that primarily uses front-end libraries and you need a simple way to manage them. Bower is designed for front-end package management and is particularly useful for managing dependencies in web applications.

  • jspm:

    Select JSPM if you want a modern package manager that supports ES6 modules and allows for dynamic loading of modules. JSPM is ideal for projects that require a modular architecture and want to leverage the latest JavaScript features.

README for pnpm

简体中文 | 日本語 | 한국어 | Italiano | Português Brasileiro

pnpm

Fast, disk space efficient package manager:

  • Fast. Up to 2x faster than the alternatives (see benchmark).
  • Efficient. Files inside node_modules are linked from a single content-addressable storage.
  • Great for monorepos.
  • Strict. A package can access only dependencies that are specified in its package.json.
  • Deterministic. Has a lockfile called pnpm-lock.yaml.
  • Works as a Node.js version manager. See pnpm env use.
  • Works everywhere. Supports Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Battle-tested. Used in production by teams of all sizes since 2016.
  • See the full feature comparison with npm and Yarn.

To quote the Rush team:

Microsoft uses pnpm in Rush repos with hundreds of projects and hundreds of PRs per day, and we’ve found it to be very fast and reliable.

npm version Join the chat at Discord OpenCollective OpenCollective X Follow Stand With Ukraine

Platinum Sponsors

Bit Bit

Gold Sponsors

Discord u|screen
JetBrains Nx
CodeRabbit Route4Me
Workleap

Silver Sponsors

Leniolabs_ Vercel Depot
moonrepo devowl.io Cerbos
vlt Vite
Vite

Support this project by becoming a sponsor.

Background

pnpm uses a content-addressable filesystem to store all files from all module directories on a disk. When using npm, if you have 100 projects using lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be stored in a content-addressable storage, so:

  1. If you depend on different versions of lodash, only the files that differ are added to the store. If lodash has 100 files, and a new version has a change only in one of those files, pnpm update will only add 1 new file to the storage.
  2. All the files are saved in a single place on the disk. When packages are installed, their files are linked from that single place consuming no additional disk space. Linking is performed using either hard-links or reflinks (copy-on-write).

As a result, you save gigabytes of space on your disk and you have a lot faster installations! If you'd like more details about the unique node_modules structure that pnpm creates and why it works fine with the Node.js ecosystem, read this small article: Flat node_modules is not the only way.

💖 Like this project? Let people know with a tweet

Installation

For installation options visit our website.

Usage

Just use pnpm in place of npm/Yarn. E.g., install dependencies via:

pnpm install

For more advanced usage, read pnpm CLI on our website, or run pnpm help.

Benchmark

pnpm is up to 2x faster than npm and Yarn classic. See all benchmarks here.

Benchmarks on an app with lots of dependencies:

Support

License

MIT