execa vs shelljs vs shx vs child_process
Node.js Process Management Libraries Comparison
1 Year
execashelljsshxchild_processSimilar Packages:
What's Node.js Process Management Libraries?

Node.js provides various libraries for managing child processes and executing shell commands, each with its unique features and use cases. These libraries facilitate the execution of external commands, scripts, and processes, enabling developers to leverage system-level functionalities directly from their Node.js applications. Understanding the differences between these libraries can help developers choose the right tool for their specific needs, whether it's for simple command execution, enhanced usability, or cross-platform compatibility.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
execa86,875,4047,031324 kB123 months agoMIT
shelljs7,836,51314,316212 kB101-BSD-3-Clause
shx836,5431,75138.6 kB20-MIT
child_process819,628159-49 years agoISC
Feature Comparison: execa vs shelljs vs shx vs child_process

Ease of Use

  • execa:

    Execa provides a clean and intuitive API, making it easy to execute commands with minimal setup. It supports promises, which simplifies asynchronous code management.

  • shelljs:

    Shelljs offers a straightforward syntax that mimics traditional shell commands, making it easy for users familiar with shell scripting to transition to Node.js.

  • shx:

    Shx is designed to be simple and user-friendly, allowing developers to run shell commands in their scripts with minimal effort, making it accessible for quick tasks.

  • child_process:

    The 'child_process' module is a core Node.js module that requires more boilerplate code to set up and manage processes, making it less user-friendly for simple tasks.

Cross-Platform Compatibility

  • execa:

    Execa is built with cross-platform compatibility in mind, allowing developers to write commands that work seamlessly on both Unix-like and Windows systems.

  • shelljs:

    Shelljs is inherently cross-platform and provides a consistent API for shell commands, abstracting away the differences between operating systems.

  • shx:

    Shx is also designed for cross-platform use, allowing developers to write scripts that work on any operating system without modification.

  • child_process:

    While 'child_process' is cross-platform, the commands executed may vary between operating systems, requiring careful handling of command differences.

Error Handling

  • execa:

    Execa simplifies error handling by returning promises that reject on command failure, providing a cleaner and more manageable approach to error management.

  • shelljs:

    Shelljs provides basic error handling, but it may not be as robust as Execa, requiring additional checks for complex scripts.

  • shx:

    Shx inherits error handling from the shell commands it wraps, which can lead to less predictable behavior and requires careful management.

  • child_process:

    Error handling in 'child_process' requires manual checks and can be verbose, as developers need to handle various error scenarios explicitly.

Performance

  • execa:

    Execa is optimized for performance and provides features like timeout settings, ensuring that commands do not hang indefinitely and resources are managed effectively.

  • shelljs:

    Shelljs may introduce some overhead due to its abstraction over shell commands, but it is generally efficient for scripting tasks.

  • shx:

    Shx is lightweight and efficient for running shell commands, but performance may vary based on the underlying command execution.

  • child_process:

    'child_process' offers high performance and low overhead for executing commands, making it suitable for resource-intensive tasks.

Community and Support

  • execa:

    Execa has a growing community and active maintenance, with good documentation and examples available for users.

  • shelljs:

    Shelljs is widely used and has a solid community, providing ample resources and examples for developers transitioning to Node.js scripting.

  • shx:

    Shx is less popular than the other libraries, which may result in limited community support and resources compared to more established options.

  • child_process:

    Being a core Node.js module, 'child_process' has extensive documentation and community support, making it reliable for developers.

How to Choose: execa vs shelljs vs shx vs child_process
  • execa:

    Choose 'execa' for a modern, user-friendly alternative to 'child_process' that simplifies command execution with promise support and better error handling. It is ideal for developers looking for a more convenient API and additional features like timeout and input/output handling.

  • shelljs:

    Choose 'shelljs' if you want a shell scripting experience in Node.js with a familiar syntax. It provides a comprehensive set of shell commands that are easy to use and work across platforms, making it suitable for scripting tasks without needing to rely on external shell environments.

  • shx:

    Choose 'shx' if you prefer a lightweight, shell command utility that allows you to run shell commands directly in Node.js scripts. It is particularly useful for developers who want to write cross-platform scripts that leverage Unix-like command-line tools without worrying about compatibility issues.

  • child_process:

    Choose 'child_process' if you need a built-in solution that provides low-level control over child processes and is suitable for executing commands with a high degree of customization. It is best for advanced users who require detailed management of process execution and communication.

README for execa
execa logo

Coverage Status

Process execution for humans





Execa runs commands in your script, application or library. Unlike shells, it is optimized for programmatic usage. Built on top of the child_process core module.


One of the maintainers @ehmicky is looking for a remote full-time position. Specialized in Node.js back-ends and CLIs, he led Netlify Build, Plugins and Configuration for 2.5 years. Feel free to contact him on his website or on LinkedIn!


Features

Install

npm install execa

Documentation

Execution:

Input/output:

Advanced usage:

Examples

Execution

Simple syntax

import {execa} from 'execa';

const {stdout} = await execa`npm run build`;
// Print command's output
console.log(stdout);

Script

import {$} from 'execa';

const {stdout: name} = await $`cat package.json`.pipe`grep name`;
console.log(name);

const branch = await $`git branch --show-current`;
await $`dep deploy --branch=${branch}`;

await Promise.all([
	$`sleep 1`,
	$`sleep 2`,
	$`sleep 3`,
]);

const directoryName = 'foo bar';
await $`mkdir /tmp/${directoryName}`;

Local binaries

$ npm install -D eslint
await execa({preferLocal: true})`eslint`;

Pipe multiple subprocesses

const {stdout, pipedFrom} = await execa`npm run build`
	.pipe`sort`
	.pipe`head -n 2`;

// Output of `npm run build | sort | head -n 2`
console.log(stdout);
// Output of `npm run build | sort`
console.log(pipedFrom[0].stdout);
// Output of `npm run build`
console.log(pipedFrom[0].pipedFrom[0].stdout);

Input/output

Interleaved output

const {all} = await execa({all: true})`npm run build`;
// stdout + stderr, interleaved
console.log(all);

Programmatic + terminal output

const {stdout} = await execa({stdout: ['pipe', 'inherit']})`npm run build`;
// stdout is also printed to the terminal
console.log(stdout);

Simple input

const getInputString = () => { /* ... */ };
const {stdout} = await execa({input: getInputString()})`sort`;
console.log(stdout);

File input

// Similar to: npm run build < input.txt
await execa({stdin: {file: 'input.txt'}})`npm run build`;

File output

// Similar to: npm run build > output.txt
await execa({stdout: {file: 'output.txt'}})`npm run build`;

Split into text lines

const {stdout} = await execa({lines: true})`npm run build`;
// Print first 10 lines
console.log(stdout.slice(0, 10).join('\n'));

Streaming

Iterate over text lines

for await (const line of execa`npm run build`) {
	if (line.includes('WARN')) {
		console.warn(line);
	}
}

Transform/filter output

let count = 0;

// Filter out secret lines, then prepend the line number
const transform = function * (line) {
	if (!line.includes('secret')) {
		yield `[${count++}] ${line}`;
	}
};

await execa({stdout: transform})`npm run build`;

Web streams

const response = await fetch('https://example.com');
await execa({stdin: response.body})`sort`;

Convert to Duplex stream

import {execa} from 'execa';
import {pipeline} from 'node:stream/promises';
import {createReadStream, createWriteStream} from 'node:fs';

await pipeline(
	createReadStream('./input.txt'),
	execa`node ./transform.js`.duplex(),
	createWriteStream('./output.txt'),
);

IPC

Exchange messages

// parent.js
import {execaNode} from 'execa';

const subprocess = execaNode`child.js`;
await subprocess.sendMessage('Hello from parent');
const message = await subprocess.getOneMessage();
console.log(message); // 'Hello from child'
// child.js
import {getOneMessage, sendMessage} from 'execa';

const message = await getOneMessage(); // 'Hello from parent'
const newMessage = message.replace('parent', 'child'); // 'Hello from child'
await sendMessage(newMessage);

Any input type

// main.js
import {execaNode} from 'execa';

const ipcInput = [
	{task: 'lint', ignore: /test\.js/},
	{task: 'copy', files: new Set(['main.js', 'index.js']),
}];
await execaNode({ipcInput})`build.js`;
// build.js
import {getOneMessage} from 'execa';

const ipcInput = await getOneMessage();

Any output type

// main.js
import {execaNode} from 'execa';

const {ipcOutput} = await execaNode`build.js`;
console.log(ipcOutput[0]); // {kind: 'start', timestamp: date}
console.log(ipcOutput[1]); // {kind: 'stop', timestamp: date}
// build.js
import {sendMessage} from 'execa';

const runBuild = () => { /* ... */ };

await sendMessage({kind: 'start', timestamp: new Date()});
await runBuild();
await sendMessage({kind: 'stop', timestamp: new Date()});

Graceful termination

// main.js
import {execaNode} from 'execa';

const controller = new AbortController();
setTimeout(() => {
	controller.abort();
}, 5000);

await execaNode({
	cancelSignal: controller.signal,
	gracefulCancel: true,
})`build.js`;
// build.js
import {getCancelSignal} from 'execa';

const cancelSignal = await getCancelSignal();
const url = 'https://example.com/build/info';
const response = await fetch(url, {signal: cancelSignal});

Debugging

Detailed error

import {execa, ExecaError} from 'execa';

try {
	await execa`unknown command`;
} catch (error) {
	if (error instanceof ExecaError) {
		console.log(error);
	}
	/*
	ExecaError: Command failed with ENOENT: unknown command
	spawn unknown ENOENT
			at ...
			at ... {
		shortMessage: 'Command failed with ENOENT: unknown command\nspawn unknown ENOENT',
		originalMessage: 'spawn unknown ENOENT',
		command: 'unknown command',
		escapedCommand: 'unknown command',
		cwd: '/path/to/cwd',
		durationMs: 28.217566,
		failed: true,
		timedOut: false,
		isCanceled: false,
		isTerminated: false,
		isMaxBuffer: false,
		code: 'ENOENT',
		stdout: '',
		stderr: '',
		stdio: [undefined, '', ''],
		pipedFrom: []
		[cause]: Error: spawn unknown ENOENT
				at ...
				at ... {
			errno: -2,
			code: 'ENOENT',
			syscall: 'spawn unknown',
			path: 'unknown',
			spawnargs: [ 'command' ]
		}
	}
	*/
}

Verbose mode

await execa`npm run build`;
await execa`npm run test`;
execa verbose output

Custom logging

import {execa as execa_} from 'execa';
import {createLogger, transports} from 'winston';

// Log to a file using Winston
const transport = new transports.File({filename: 'logs.txt'});
const logger = createLogger({transports: [transport]});
const LOG_LEVELS = {
	command: 'info',
	output: 'verbose',
	ipc: 'verbose',
	error: 'error',
	duration: 'info',
};

const execa = execa_({
	verbose(verboseLine, {message, ...verboseObject}) {
		const level = LOG_LEVELS[verboseObject.type];
		logger[level](message, verboseObject);
	},
});

await execa`npm run build`;
await execa`npm run test`;

Related

Maintainers