slate vs draft-js vs react-quill vs react-draft-wysiwyg vs react-contenteditable
Rich Text Editors for React Comparison
1 Year
slatedraft-jsreact-quillreact-draft-wysiwygreact-contenteditableSimilar Packages:
What's Rich Text Editors for React?

These libraries provide various functionalities for implementing rich text editing capabilities in React applications. They allow developers to create text editors that support formatting options such as bold, italic, lists, links, and more. Each library has its own approach to handling content, user interactions, and extensibility, catering to different use cases and developer preferences.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
slate1,289,60930,9332.15 MB68022 days agoMIT
draft-js837,33422,662-9555 years agoMIT
react-quill722,2426,957405 kB428-MIT
react-draft-wysiwyg261,8356,482299 kB755-MIT
react-contenteditable141,4051,66948.6 kB472 years agoApache-2.0
Feature Comparison: slate vs draft-js vs react-quill vs react-draft-wysiwyg vs react-contenteditable

Customization

  • slate:

    Slate is built for customization, enabling developers to create entirely new editing experiences. You can define your own schema, rendering logic, and behaviors, making it the most flexible option for building specialized editors.

  • draft-js:

    Draft.js offers extensive customization options, allowing developers to create tailored editing experiences. You can define custom block types, inline styles, and even implement complex features like mentions or hashtags, making it suitable for applications with specific needs.

  • react-quill:

    react-quill supports customization through themes and modules, allowing developers to modify the editor's appearance and functionality. You can easily add custom formats and controls, making it versatile for various applications.

  • react-draft-wysiwyg:

    react-draft-wysiwyg provides a straightforward way to customize the toolbar and editor styles. It allows for easy integration of additional features like image uploads and custom buttons, making it a good choice for those needing a balance of customization and ease of use.

  • react-contenteditable:

    Customization in react-contenteditable is limited to basic HTML attributes and styles. It is designed for simplicity, so while you can style the content, you won't have the same level of control over the editing experience as with more complex libraries.

Ease of Use

  • slate:

    Slate has a moderate learning curve due to its flexibility and lower-level API. While it allows for extensive customization, developers may need to invest time in understanding its architecture and how to implement custom features.

  • draft-js:

    Draft.js has a steeper learning curve due to its complex API and state management. While it offers powerful features, developers may need time to fully understand its concepts and effectively implement them in their applications.

  • react-quill:

    react-quill is designed with usability in mind, offering a clean interface and straightforward API. Developers can quickly set up the editor and customize it, making it a popular choice for many applications.

  • react-draft-wysiwyg:

    react-draft-wysiwyg is user-friendly, providing a familiar WYSIWYG interface that is easy to understand for both developers and end-users. Its built-in toolbar simplifies the editing process, making it accessible for non-technical users.

  • react-contenteditable:

    react-contenteditable is very easy to use, as it behaves like a standard input field. Developers can quickly integrate it into their projects without needing to learn a new API, making it ideal for simple use cases.

Performance

  • slate:

    Slate's performance can vary based on how it is implemented. While it can handle complex documents efficiently, improper management of state and rendering can lead to performance bottlenecks, requiring careful optimization.

  • draft-js:

    Draft.js is optimized for performance, especially with large documents. It uses an immutable data structure to manage content, which helps in efficiently updating the editor state and rendering changes without unnecessary re-renders.

  • react-quill:

    react-quill is optimized for performance and can handle large amounts of content efficiently. Its virtual DOM implementation helps in minimizing re-renders, making it suitable for applications with rich text requirements.

  • react-draft-wysiwyg:

    react-draft-wysiwyg maintains good performance for most use cases, but heavy customizations or large content may lead to performance issues. It is generally efficient for standard text editing tasks.

  • react-contenteditable:

    react-contenteditable performs well for simple use cases but may struggle with performance in larger documents or complex editing scenarios due to its reliance on the DOM for content management.

Community and Support

  • slate:

    Slate has an active community and is well-documented, providing a wealth of resources for developers. Its flexibility attracts a diverse range of use cases, fostering a supportive environment for collaboration and knowledge sharing.

  • draft-js:

    Draft.js has a strong community and is backed by Facebook, ensuring ongoing support and updates. There are numerous resources, examples, and plugins available to assist developers in using the library effectively.

  • react-quill:

    react-quill has a vibrant community and extensive documentation, providing plenty of resources for developers. Its popularity means that many developers have shared their experiences and solutions online, making it easier to troubleshoot issues.

  • react-draft-wysiwyg:

    react-draft-wysiwyg benefits from a growing community and good documentation, making it easier for developers to find help and examples. Its popularity ensures a steady stream of updates and improvements.

  • react-contenteditable:

    react-contenteditable has a smaller community compared to others, which may result in fewer resources and support options. However, it is simple enough that many developers can quickly adapt it without extensive documentation.

How to Choose: slate vs draft-js vs react-quill vs react-draft-wysiwyg vs react-contenteditable
  • slate:

    Choose Slate if you need a highly customizable and extensible framework for building rich text editors from scratch. It provides a lower-level API that allows you to define your own editor behavior and structure, making it suitable for complex applications with unique requirements.

  • draft-js:

    Choose Draft.js if you need a highly customizable editor that integrates well with React and allows for fine-grained control over the content and its state. It is ideal for applications that require complex text manipulation and custom behavior.

  • react-quill:

    Consider react-quill if you are looking for a powerful, easy-to-use editor with a rich feature set and a clean interface. It is particularly useful for applications that require a balance between simplicity and functionality, with support for themes and custom modules.

  • react-draft-wysiwyg:

    Select react-draft-wysiwyg if you prefer a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editor built on top of Draft.js, offering a more user-friendly interface with built-in toolbar options for formatting. This is great for applications that need a rich text editor without heavy customization.

  • react-contenteditable:

    Opt for react-contenteditable if you want a simple, lightweight solution that allows you to easily edit content directly in the DOM. It is suitable for projects that require minimal setup and straightforward editing capabilities without extensive formatting features.

README for slate

This package contains the core logic of Slate. Feel free to poke around to learn more!

Note: A number of source files contain extracted types for Interfaces or Transforms. This is done currently to enable custom type extensions as found in packages/src/interfaces/custom-types.ts.