handlebars vs ejs vs mustache vs nunjucks vs liquidjs vs twig vs pug
Template Engines for Web Development
handlebarsejsmustachenunjucksliquidjstwigpug
Template Engines for Web Development

Template engines are tools that allow developers to generate HTML dynamically by embedding data into templates. They help separate the presentation layer from the business logic, making it easier to manage and maintain web applications. Each of these template engines has its unique syntax and features, catering to different use cases and developer preferences. They facilitate the rendering of views in web applications, enabling developers to create dynamic and interactive user interfaces efficiently.

Npm Package Weekly Downloads Trend
3 Years
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
handlebars29,587,30018,5912.78 MB1153 years agoMIT
ejs25,300,9498,083183 kB25a month agoApache-2.0
mustache10,264,22416,717-1155 years agoMIT
nunjucks1,958,8398,8911.77 MB3503 years agoBSD-2-Clause
liquidjs1,091,1561,7881.77 MB84 months agoMIT
twig479,9881,9171.17 MB652 years agoBSD-2-Clause
pug0-59.7 kB-2 years agoMIT
Feature Comparison: handlebars vs ejs vs mustache vs nunjucks vs liquidjs vs twig vs pug

Syntax

  • handlebars:

    Handlebars employs a more structured syntax with placeholders and expressions, promoting a clean separation between HTML and logic. It avoids inline JavaScript, which can lead to cleaner templates.

  • ejs:

    EJS uses plain HTML with embedded JavaScript, making it easy for developers familiar with HTML to get started. It allows for inline JavaScript execution, which can be both a strength and a weakness depending on the use case.

  • mustache:

    Mustache uses a minimalistic syntax with curly braces for placeholders, focusing on simplicity and logic-less templates. This makes it easy to understand but limits dynamic capabilities.

  • nunjucks:

    Nunjucks combines a familiar syntax similar to Jinja2, allowing for template inheritance and blocks. This makes it powerful for creating complex layouts while maintaining readability.

  • liquidjs:

    LiquidJS features a simple syntax with tags, filters, and objects, designed to be safe and secure. It is easy to read and write, making it user-friendly for non-developers as well.

  • twig:

    Twig employs a syntax that is both expressive and powerful, with features like filters and functions. It is designed to be intuitive for developers, especially those familiar with PHP.

  • pug:

    Pug uses an indentation-based syntax that eliminates the need for closing tags, resulting in cleaner and more concise code. Its unique syntax can have a learning curve but enhances readability.

Features

  • handlebars:

    Handlebars offers advanced features like helpers, partials, and built-in support for custom helpers, making it ideal for larger applications that require reusable components.

  • ejs:

    EJS supports partials, includes, and basic logic, making it suitable for simple applications. However, it lacks more advanced features like template inheritance.

  • mustache:

    Mustache is intentionally logic-less, focusing on simplicity. It supports basic features like sections and inverted sections but lacks advanced capabilities like inheritance.

  • nunjucks:

    Nunjucks includes powerful features such as template inheritance, asynchronous rendering, and custom filters, making it suitable for complex applications.

  • liquidjs:

    LiquidJS provides a secure environment with built-in filters and tags, making it suitable for user-generated content. It also supports custom filters for added flexibility.

  • twig:

    Twig provides a rich set of features, including template inheritance, filters, and macros, making it a powerful choice for complex applications that require a robust templating solution.

  • pug:

    Pug supports mixins, inheritance, and includes, allowing for modular and reusable templates. Its features enhance productivity and maintainability in larger projects.

Performance

  • handlebars:

    Handlebars is optimized for performance, especially with precompiled templates. It is efficient for larger applications with reusable components, as it minimizes the amount of logic in templates.

  • ejs:

    EJS is lightweight and performs well for small to medium-sized applications. However, performance may degrade with complex logic embedded in templates due to its inline JavaScript execution.

  • mustache:

    Mustache is lightweight and performs well due to its minimalistic design. However, its lack of advanced features may limit performance in complex scenarios.

  • nunjucks:

    Nunjucks can handle complex templates efficiently, but performance may vary depending on the use of asynchronous rendering. It is generally performant for large applications.

  • liquidjs:

    LiquidJS is designed for performance and security, making it suitable for applications that require safe rendering of user-generated content. Its performance is generally good for most use cases.

  • twig:

    Twig is optimized for performance, especially in PHP environments. Its caching mechanism enhances performance for applications with many templates.

  • pug:

    Pug is designed for performance with its indentation-based syntax, which reduces the amount of code to parse. However, performance can be impacted by complex mixins and includes.

Community and Ecosystem

  • handlebars:

    Handlebars has a vibrant community and a rich ecosystem of extensions and helpers, providing ample resources for developers. It is widely adopted in various frameworks and applications.

  • ejs:

    EJS has a strong community and is widely used in the Node.js ecosystem, making it easy to find resources and support. However, it may lack some advanced features compared to others.

  • mustache:

    Mustache has a smaller community compared to others but is widely recognized for its simplicity. It is supported in multiple languages, making it versatile but with limited resources.

  • nunjucks:

    Nunjucks has a supportive community and is well-documented, making it easy to find help and resources. It is increasingly popular for server-side rendering in Node.js applications.

  • liquidjs:

    LiquidJS has a growing community, especially in the context of secure templating for user-generated content. Its ecosystem is expanding with various integrations and plugins.

  • twig:

    Twig has a large and active community, especially in the PHP world. It is well-documented and has a rich ecosystem of plugins and extensions, making it a robust choice for developers.

  • pug:

    Pug has a strong community with extensive documentation and resources available. Its unique syntax has garnered a dedicated user base, especially in the Node.js ecosystem.

Learning Curve

  • handlebars:

    Handlebars has a moderate learning curve due to its structured syntax and concepts like helpers and partials, but it is generally easy to learn for those with basic templating experience.

  • ejs:

    EJS has a gentle learning curve, especially for those familiar with HTML and JavaScript. Its straightforward syntax makes it easy to pick up and start using quickly.

  • mustache:

    Mustache is very easy to learn due to its minimalistic design. Its logic-less approach simplifies the learning process for new developers.

  • nunjucks:

    Nunjucks has a moderate learning curve, especially for those familiar with other templating engines. Its advanced features may require some time to master, but it is generally approachable.

  • liquidjs:

    LiquidJS is user-friendly and has a low learning curve, making it accessible for non-developers. Its syntax is intuitive, allowing users to create templates without extensive coding knowledge.

  • twig:

    Twig has a moderate learning curve, especially for developers familiar with PHP. Its expressive syntax and rich feature set may take some time to master, but it is generally intuitive.

  • pug:

    Pug has a steeper learning curve due to its unique syntax and indentation-based structure. However, once learned, it can significantly enhance productivity and code readability.

How to Choose: handlebars vs ejs vs mustache vs nunjucks vs liquidjs vs twig vs pug
  • handlebars:

    Select Handlebars if you prefer a logic-less templating approach that emphasizes separation of concerns. It supports helpers and partials, making it suitable for larger applications requiring reusable templates.

  • ejs:

    Choose EJS if you need a simple and straightforward templating engine that allows you to embed JavaScript directly into your HTML. It is lightweight and easy to integrate with Express.js applications.

  • mustache:

    Use Mustache if you need a minimalistic and logic-less templating engine that can be used across different programming languages. Its simplicity makes it easy to learn and implement in various projects.

  • nunjucks:

    Choose Nunjucks if you need a powerful templating engine with advanced features like template inheritance and asynchronous control. It is well-suited for complex applications requiring a robust templating solution.

  • liquidjs:

    Opt for LiquidJS if you are looking for a secure and flexible templating engine that is designed for safe rendering. It is particularly useful in environments where you want to allow users to create templates without executing arbitrary JavaScript.

  • twig:

    Opt for Twig if you are looking for a flexible and powerful templating engine with a rich feature set, including filters, functions, and template inheritance. It is particularly popular in PHP applications but can also be used in Node.js.

  • pug:

    Select Pug if you want a clean and concise syntax that reduces the amount of HTML code you write. Its indentation-based structure can improve readability and maintainability, especially in large projects.

README for handlebars

CI Build Status jsDelivr Hits npm downloads npm version Bundle size Install size

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Checkout the official Handlebars docs site at https://handlebarsjs.com/ and the live demo at http://tryhandlebarsjs.com/.

Installing

See our installation documentation.

Usage

In general, the syntax of Handlebars.js templates is a superset of Mustache templates. For basic syntax, check out the Mustache manpage.

Once you have a template, use the Handlebars.compile method to compile the template into a function. The generated function takes a context argument, which will be used to render the template.

var source = "<p>Hello, my name is {{name}}. I am from {{hometown}}. I have " +
             "{{kids.length}} kids:</p>" +
             "<ul>{{#kids}}<li>{{name}} is {{age}}</li>{{/kids}}</ul>";
var template = Handlebars.compile(source);

var data = { "name": "Alan", "hometown": "Somewhere, TX",
             "kids": [{"name": "Jimmy", "age": "12"}, {"name": "Sally", "age": "4"}]};
var result = template(data);

// Would render:
// <p>Hello, my name is Alan. I am from Somewhere, TX. I have 2 kids:</p>
// <ul>
//   <li>Jimmy is 12</li>
//   <li>Sally is 4</li>
// </ul>

Full documentation and more examples are at handlebarsjs.com.

Precompiling Templates

Handlebars allows templates to be precompiled and included as javascript code rather than the handlebars template allowing for faster startup time. Full details are located here.

Differences Between Handlebars.js and Mustache

Handlebars.js adds a couple of additional features to make writing templates easier and also changes a tiny detail of how partials work.

Block expressions have the same syntax as mustache sections but should not be confused with one another. Sections are akin to an implicit each or with statement depending on the input data and helpers are explicit pieces of code that are free to implement whatever behavior they like. The mustache spec defines the exact behavior of sections. In the case of name conflicts, helpers are given priority.

Compatibility

There are a few Mustache behaviors that Handlebars does not implement.

  • Handlebars deviates from Mustache slightly in that it does not perform recursive lookup by default. The compile time compat flag must be set to enable this functionality. Users should note that there is a performance cost for enabling this flag. The exact cost varies by template, but it's recommended that performance sensitive operations should avoid this mode and instead opt for explicit path references.
  • The optional Mustache-style lambdas are not supported. Instead Handlebars provides its own lambda resolution that follows the behaviors of helpers.
  • Alternative delimiters are not supported.

Supported Environments

Handlebars has been designed to work in any ECMAScript 3 environment. This includes

  • Node.js
  • Chrome
  • Firefox
  • Safari 5+
  • Opera 11+
  • IE 6+

Older versions and other runtimes are likely to work but have not been formally tested. The compiler requires JSON.stringify to be implemented natively or via a polyfill. If using the precompiler this is not necessary.

Performance

In a rough performance test, precompiled Handlebars.js templates (in the original version of Handlebars.js) rendered in about half the time of Mustache templates. It would be a shame if it were any other way, since they were precompiled, but the difference in architecture does have some big performance advantages. Justin Marney, a.k.a. gotascii, confirmed that with an independent test. The rewritten Handlebars (current version) is faster than the old version, with many performance tests being 5 to 7 times faster than the Mustache equivalent.

Upgrading

See release-notes.md for upgrade notes.

Known Issues

See FAQ.md for known issues and common pitfalls.

Handlebars in the Wild

  • Assemble, by @jonschlinkert and @doowb, is a static site generator that uses Handlebars.js as its template engine.
  • Cory, by @leo, is another tiny static site generator
  • CoSchedule An editorial calendar for WordPress that uses Handlebars.js
  • dashbars A modern helper library for Handlebars.js.
  • Ember.js makes Handlebars.js the primary way to structure your views, also with automatic data binding support.
  • Ghost Just a blogging platform.
  • handlebars_assets: A Rails Asset Pipeline gem from Les Hill (@leshill).
  • handlebars-helpers is an extensive library with 100+ handlebars helpers.
  • handlebars-layouts is a set of helpers which implement extendible and embeddable layout blocks as seen in other popular templating languages.
  • hbs: An Express.js view engine adapter for Handlebars.js, from Don Park.
  • koa-hbs: koa generator based renderer for Handlebars.js.
  • jblotus created http://tryhandlebarsjs.com for anyone who would like to try out Handlebars.js in their browser.
  • jQuery plugin: allows you to use Handlebars.js with jQuery.
  • Lumbar provides easy module-based template management for handlebars projects.
  • Marionette.Handlebars adds support for Handlebars and Mustache templates to Marionette.
  • sammy.js by Aaron Quint, a.k.a. quirkey, supports Handlebars.js as one of its template plugins.
  • SproutCore uses Handlebars.js as its main templating engine, extending it with automatic data binding support.
  • YUI implements a port of handlebars
  • Swag by @elving is a growing collection of helpers for handlebars.js. Give your handlebars.js templates some swag son!
  • DOMBars is a DOM-based templating engine built on the Handlebars parser and runtime DEPRECATED
  • promised-handlebars is a wrapper for Handlebars that allows helpers to return Promises.
  • just-handlebars-helpers A fully tested lightweight package with common Handlebars helpers.

External Resources

Have a project using Handlebars? Send us a pull request!

License

Handlebars.js is released under the MIT license.