rxjs vs immutable vs ramda vs fp-ts
Functional Programming and Reactive Libraries for JavaScript
rxjsimmutableramdafp-tsSimilar Packages:
Functional Programming and Reactive Libraries for JavaScript

fp-ts, immutable, ramda, and rxjs are all JavaScript libraries that embrace functional programming principles, but they address fundamentally different problems in frontend development. fp-ts provides algebraic data types and type-safe functional patterns for TypeScript, enabling robust error handling and pure computations. immutable offers persistent, immutable data structures like Map and List that prevent accidental mutations through structural sharing. ramda delivers a suite of practical, curried utility functions for declarative data transformation and composition. rxjs implements the Observable pattern for managing asynchronous event streams over time, with powerful operators for combining and controlling sequences of values. While they share a functional philosophy, they operate at different layers—from data structures to computation modeling to time-based reactivity—and are often used together in mature codebases.

Npm Package Weekly Downloads Trend
3 Years
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
rxjs65,173,50631,6114.5 MB290a year agoApache-2.0
immutable27,929,83633,099709 kB1213 months agoMIT
ramda11,020,32624,1081.2 MB1483 months agoMIT
fp-ts3,504,87311,4494.74 MB1925 months agoMIT

Functional Programming and Reactive Patterns in JavaScript: fp-ts vs immutable vs ramda vs rxjs

When building complex frontend applications, managing state, handling side effects, and composing logic cleanly become critical challenges. The libraries fp-ts, immutable, ramda, and rxjs each offer distinct approaches rooted in functional programming principles—but they solve different problems and operate at different layers of your application stack. Let’s break down what each does, how they differ technically, and where they shine.

🧠 Core Philosophy and Problem Domain

fp-ts brings strongly-typed functional programming to TypeScript. It provides algebraic data types (like Option, Either, Task) and type classes (like Functor, Monad) that let you model computations with explicit error handling, optional values, and asynchronous operations—all while staying within TypeScript’s type system.

// fp-ts: Safe division with Either
import * as E from 'fp-ts/Either';

const safeDivide = (a: number, b: number): E.Either<string, number> =>
  b === 0 ? E.left('Division by zero') : E.right(a / b);

const result = safeDivide(10, 2); // E.right(5)

immutable focuses on persistent, immutable data structures. It gives you collections like List, Map, and Set that never mutate in place—instead, every update returns a new instance with structural sharing for efficiency.

// immutable: Immutable Map update
import { Map } from 'immutable';

const user = Map({ name: 'Alice', age: 30 });
const updated = user.set('age', 31);
console.log(user.get('age')); // 30 (unchanged)
console.log(updated.get('age')); // 31

ramda is a practical utility library for functional programming in JavaScript. It offers curried, data-last functions for common operations like mapping, filtering, and composing—designed to be used together to build pipelines of transformations.

// ramda: Compose a data pipeline
import * as R from 'ramda';

const users = [{ name: 'Alice', active: true }, { name: 'Bob', active: false }];
const getActiveNames = R.pipe(
  R.filter(R.propEq('active', true)),
  R.map(R.prop('name'))
);

console.log(getActiveNames(users)); // ['Alice']

rxjs handles asynchronous event streams using the Observable pattern. It’s built for managing sequences of values over time—like user inputs, HTTP responses, or WebSocket messages—with operators to transform, combine, and control these streams.

// rxjs: Handle click stream
import { fromEvent } from 'rxjs';
import { map, filter, debounceTime } from 'rxjs/operators';

const clicks$ = fromEvent(document, 'click');
const filteredClicks$ = clicks$.pipe(
  map((e: Event) => e.target),
  filter(target => target instanceof HTMLElement),
  debounceTime(300)
);

filteredClicks$.subscribe(target => console.log('Clicked:', target));

🔁 Mutability vs Immutability vs Pure Functions vs Streams

These libraries address four different concerns:

  • immutable solves data mutation: ensures your state never changes unexpectedly.
  • ramda solves data transformation: gives you reusable, composable functions to process data.
  • fp-ts solves computation modeling: lets you represent success/failure, async, and optional logic as typed values.
  • rxjs solves time-based events: manages sequences of values that arrive over time.

You can—and often do—use them together. For example, you might use immutable for your Redux store, ramda to transform API responses before storing them, fp-ts to handle API errors safely, and rxjs to manage real-time WebSocket feeds.

🛠️ Type Safety and TypeScript Integration

fp-ts is built for TypeScript from the ground up. Its types are precise and leverage advanced features like conditional types and inference. If you’re using TypeScript and want to enforce correctness at compile time (e.g., ensuring all error cases are handled), fp-ts is unmatched.

// fp-ts: Exhaustive pattern matching
import * as O from 'fp-ts/Option';

const getName = (user?: { name: string }): O.Option<string> =>
  user ? O.some(user.name) : O.none;

O.match(
  () => 'No name',
  name => `Hello ${name}`
)(getName({ name: 'Alice' })); // "Hello Alice"

immutable ships with solid TypeScript definitions. Its APIs are typed, so you get autocomplete and safety when working with Map, List, etc.

// immutable: Typed Map
import { Map } from 'immutable';

const config: Map<string, number> = Map({ timeout: 5000 });
const value = config.get('timeout'); // number | undefined

ramda has community-maintained types via DefinitelyTyped. While generally reliable, some edge cases may require type assertions due to JavaScript’s dynamic nature and Ramda’s heavy use of currying.

// ramda: May need type hints for complex pipelines
import * as R from 'ramda';

const add = (a: number, b: number) => a + b;
const curriedAdd = R.curry(add); // Type inferred correctly in most cases

rxjs has first-class TypeScript support. Observables are strongly typed, and operators preserve type information through the chain.

// rxjs: Typed observable
import { of } from 'rxjs';
import { map } from 'rxjs/operators';

const numbers$ = of(1, 2, 3).pipe(map(n => n.toString()));
// numbers$ is Observable<string>

⚙️ Performance Characteristics

immutable uses structural sharing—when you “update” a collection, it reuses unchanged parts of the old structure. This avoids full copies but adds minor overhead for small objects compared to plain JS. Best for medium-to-large nested data.

ramda functions are pure and optimized, but heavy use of currying and function composition can create many intermediate closures. Usually negligible, but avoid deep pipelines in hot loops.

fp-ts’s abstractions (like Either) add minimal runtime overhead—they’re just tagged unions. The main cost is cognitive: learning the patterns.

rxjs is highly optimized for stream processing. Operators like debounceTime or switchMap are battle-tested. However, improper use (e.g., not unsubscribing) can cause memory leaks.

🔄 Real-World Integration Scenarios

Scenario 1: Form Validation with Error Handling

You need to validate user input and show specific error messages.

  • Best choice: fp-ts with Either
  • Why? Explicitly models success vs failure with typed errors.
// fp-ts
import * as E from 'fp-ts/Either';
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function';

const validateEmail = (email: string) =>
  email.includes('@')
    ? E.right(email)
    : E.left('Invalid email');

const result = pipe(
  'alice@example.com',
  validateEmail,
  E.map(email => ({ email }))
);

Scenario 2: Global State Management

You’re using Redux or a similar store and want to avoid accidental mutations.

  • Best choice: immutable
  • Why? Guarantees immutability, integrates well with React’s shouldComponentUpdate.
// immutable with Redux reducer
import { Map } from 'immutable';

const initialState = Map({ count: 0 });
const reducer = (state = initialState, action) => {
  switch (action.type) {
    case 'INCREMENT':
      return state.update('count', n => n + 1);
    default:
      return state;
  }
};

Scenario 3: Data Transformation Pipeline

You fetch JSON from an API and need to clean, filter, and reshape it.

  • Best choice: ramda
  • Why? Concise, readable pipelines with reusable utilities.
// ramda
import * as R from 'ramda';

const processUsers = R.pipe(
  R.filter(R.propSatisfies(R.gt(R.__, 18), 'age')),
  R.map(R.pick(['name', 'email']))
);

processUsers([{ name: 'Alice', age: 25, email: 'a@example.com' }]);

Scenario 4: Real-Time Search Suggestions

As the user types, you want to debounce input, fetch suggestions, and cancel stale requests.

  • Best choice: rxjs
  • Why? Built-in operators handle timing, cancellation, and concurrency perfectly.
// rxjs
import { fromEvent } from 'rxjs';
import { map, debounceTime, switchMap } from 'rxjs/operators';

const input$ = fromEvent(inputElement, 'input').pipe(
  map(e => (e.target as HTMLInputElement).value),
  debounceTime(300),
  switchMap(query => fetch(`/api/search?q=${query}`))
);

input$.subscribe(response => updateSuggestions(response));

📌 Summary Table

LibraryPrimary Use CaseKey StrengthTypical Integration Point
fp-tsTyped functional error/async handlingCompile-time safety, algebraic typesBusiness logic, API clients
immutablePersistent immutable dataStructural sharing, no mutationsGlobal state (Redux, Zustand)
ramdaDeclarative data transformationCurried, composable utilitiesData processing, helpers
rxjsAsynchronous event streamsTime-based operators, cancellationUI event handling, real-time data

💡 Final Recommendation

Don’t think of these as competitors—they’re tools for different jobs:

  • Need type-safe error handling in TypeScript? Reach for fp-ts.
  • Worried about accidental mutations in large state trees? Use immutable.
  • Building data transformation pipelines? ramda keeps code clean.
  • Managing user interactions or real-time feeds? rxjs is purpose-built for it.

In modern apps, it’s common to use two or more together. For example: use rxjs to handle a stream of form submissions, fp-ts to validate each submission, ramda to normalize the data, and immutable to update your global state. Each plays to its strengths without overlap.

How to Choose: rxjs vs immutable vs ramda vs fp-ts
  • rxjs:

    Choose rxjs if your application deals with complex asynchronous event streams—like user interactions, real-time data feeds, or coordinated API calls—where you need fine-grained control over timing, cancellation, and combination of sequences. Its operators like switchMap and debounceTime solve common reactive problems elegantly. Avoid for simple one-off promises or synchronous logic, as it introduces conceptual overhead and potential memory leak risks if subscriptions aren’t managed properly.

  • immutable:

    Choose immutable if you need guaranteed immutability for complex nested data structures and want to optimize performance through structural sharing, especially in React applications where shallow equality checks can prevent unnecessary re-renders. It integrates well with state management libraries like Redux. Avoid for simple flat objects where native JavaScript spread operators or Object.freeze() suffice, as it adds bundle size and requires learning its API.

  • ramda:

    Choose ramda if you frequently write data transformation pipelines and prefer a consistent set of curried, data-last utility functions that encourage point-free style and composition. It’s excellent for cleaning, filtering, and reshaping data from APIs or user inputs. Avoid if you only need occasional utility functions (consider native methods or Lodash instead) or if your team finds its functional style overly abstract for simple tasks.

  • fp-ts:

    Choose fp-ts if you're using TypeScript and need compile-time guarantees for error handling, optional values, or asynchronous workflows using algebraic data types like Either and Option. It’s ideal for domain modeling where you want to make invalid states unrepresentable and enforce exhaustive case analysis. Avoid if your team isn’t comfortable with functional programming concepts or if you’re working in a pure JavaScript codebase without TypeScript.

README for rxjs

RxJS Logo RxJS: Reactive Extensions For JavaScript

CI npm version Join the chat at https://gitter.im/Reactive-Extensions/RxJS

The Roadmap from RxJS 7 to 8

Curious what's next for RxJS? Follow along with Issue 6367.

RxJS 7

FOR 6.X PLEASE GO TO THE 6.x BRANCH

Reactive Extensions Library for JavaScript. This is a rewrite of Reactive-Extensions/RxJS and is the latest production-ready version of RxJS. This rewrite is meant to have better performance, better modularity, better debuggable call stacks, while staying mostly backwards compatible, with some breaking changes that reduce the API surface.

Apache 2.0 License

Versions In This Repository

  • master - This is all of the current work, which is against v7 of RxJS right now
  • 6.x - This is the branch for version 6.X

Most PRs should be made to master.

Important

By contributing or commenting on issues in this repository, whether you've read them or not, you're agreeing to the Contributor Code of Conduct. Much like traffic laws, ignorance doesn't grant you immunity.

Installation and Usage

ES6 via npm

npm install rxjs

It's recommended to pull in the Observable creation methods you need directly from 'rxjs' as shown below with range. If you're using RxJS version 7.2 or above, you can pull in any operator you need from the same spot, 'rxjs'.

import { range, filter, map } from 'rxjs';

range(1, 200)
  .pipe(
    filter(x => x % 2 === 1),
    map(x => x + x)
  )
  .subscribe(x => console.log(x));

If you're using RxJS version below 7.2, you can pull in any operator you need from one spot, under 'rxjs/operators'.

import { range } from 'rxjs';
import { filter, map } from 'rxjs/operators';

range(1, 200)
  .pipe(
    filter(x => x % 2 === 1),
    map(x => x + x)
  )
  .subscribe(x => console.log(x));

CDN

For CDN, you can use unpkg:

https://unpkg.com/rxjs@^7/dist/bundles/rxjs.umd.min.js

The global namespace for rxjs is rxjs:

const { range } = rxjs;
const { filter, map } = rxjs.operators;

range(1, 200)
  .pipe(
    filter(x => x % 2 === 1),
    map(x => x + x)
  )
  .subscribe(x => console.log(x));

Goals

  • Smaller overall bundles sizes
  • Provide better performance than preceding versions of RxJS
  • To model/follow the Observable Spec Proposal to the observable
  • Provide more modular file structure in a variety of formats
  • Provide more debuggable call stacks than preceding versions of RxJS

Building/Testing

  • npm run compile build everything
  • npm test run tests
  • npm run dtslint run dtslint tests

Adding documentation

We appreciate all contributions to the documentation of any type. All of the information needed to get the docs app up and running locally as well as how to contribute can be found in the documentation directory.