husky vs lint-staged vs lefthook vs pre-commit
Git Hooks and Pre-commit Tools Comparison
1 Year
huskylint-stagedlefthookpre-commitSimilar Packages:
What's Git Hooks and Pre-commit Tools?

These packages are designed to enhance the development workflow by automating tasks during the Git commit process. They help enforce code quality and consistency by running scripts or checks before code is committed to the repository. By integrating these tools, developers can catch issues early, maintain coding standards, and streamline collaboration in a team environment. Their primary focus is on ensuring that only code that meets predefined criteria is committed, thus improving overall code quality and reducing the likelihood of introducing bugs.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
husky14,406,51033,1784.04 kB764 months agoMIT
lint-staged11,325,51113,698128 kB58a month agoMIT
lefthook391,6325,52223.6 kB357 days agoMIT
pre-commit307,9421,881-788 years agoMIT
Feature Comparison: husky vs lint-staged vs lefthook vs pre-commit

Ease of Use

  • husky:

    Husky is known for its straightforward setup process. It integrates seamlessly with existing Git workflows, allowing developers to add hooks with minimal configuration. Its simplicity makes it a popular choice for teams looking to quickly implement Git hooks without extensive overhead.

  • lint-staged:

    Lint-staged is very easy to use, especially for developers familiar with npm scripts. It requires minimal configuration to get started and focuses on running tasks only on staged files, making it efficient and straightforward.

  • lefthook:

    Lefthook offers a user-friendly CLI for managing hooks, but its advanced configuration options may require a bit more initial setup. However, once configured, it provides powerful capabilities for managing hooks across multiple repositories.

  • pre-commit:

    Pre-commit has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive configuration options. However, once set up, it provides a robust framework for managing a wide variety of hooks.

Performance

  • husky:

    Husky runs hooks synchronously, which can potentially slow down the commit process if the hooks are not optimized. However, it allows for easy integration of performance-enhancing tools like lint-staged to mitigate this issue.

  • lint-staged:

    Lint-staged optimizes performance by only running tasks on files that are staged for commit. This targeted approach minimizes the time spent on checks, making it a fast solution for maintaining code quality.

  • lefthook:

    Lefthook is designed for performance, running hooks in parallel by default. This can significantly speed up the commit process, especially for larger projects with multiple hooks.

  • pre-commit:

    Pre-commit can be slower than other options if not configured properly, as it runs all specified hooks regardless of the files being committed. However, it can be optimized by using filters to limit the scope of checks.

Configurability

  • husky:

    Husky allows for basic configuration of hooks directly in the package.json file, making it easy to manage. However, it lacks some advanced features found in other tools for more complex workflows.

  • lint-staged:

    Lint-staged is highly configurable for defining which linters or formatters to run on staged files. It allows for granular control over the tasks executed, making it adaptable to various project needs.

  • lefthook:

    Lefthook offers extensive configurability, allowing developers to define hooks in a YAML configuration file. This flexibility is beneficial for complex projects or monorepos that require tailored hook setups.

  • pre-commit:

    Pre-commit provides a wide range of configuration options, allowing developers to specify hooks and their behavior in detail. This makes it suitable for diverse projects but may require more effort to set up.

Community Support

  • husky:

    Husky has a large user base and extensive documentation, making it easy to find support and resources. Its popularity ensures that many developers are familiar with its usage.

  • lint-staged:

    Lint-staged benefits from a strong community and is widely used alongside Husky, leading to a wealth of shared knowledge and examples for effective usage.

  • lefthook:

    Lefthook is gaining traction in the community, but its user base is smaller compared to Husky. Documentation is available, but community resources may be less abundant.

  • pre-commit:

    Pre-commit has a robust community and extensive documentation, particularly for Python projects. Its language-agnostic nature also means that it has support across various programming languages.

Integration

  • husky:

    Husky integrates seamlessly with npm scripts, making it easy to incorporate into existing workflows. It is particularly effective when used alongside lint-staged for enhanced code quality checks.

  • lint-staged:

    Lint-staged is designed to work in conjunction with Husky, allowing for a streamlined process where only staged files are checked. This integration enhances performance and efficiency during commits.

  • lefthook:

    Lefthook can integrate with various programming languages and tools, providing flexibility for diverse projects. It is especially useful for monorepos that require consistent hook management across multiple packages.

  • pre-commit:

    Pre-commit supports a wide range of hooks and can integrate with various tools across different programming languages, making it a versatile choice for teams working on diverse projects.

How to Choose: husky vs lint-staged vs lefthook vs pre-commit
  • husky:

    Choose Husky if you want a simple and effective way to manage Git hooks directly in your project. It allows you to easily set up hooks for various Git actions and is widely adopted in the community, making it a reliable choice for many projects.

  • lint-staged:

    Choose lint-staged if your primary goal is to run linters or formatters on staged files only. It optimizes the commit process by only checking files that are about to be committed, which can significantly speed up the workflow and reduce unnecessary checks on unchanged files.

  • lefthook:

    Choose Lefthook if you need a highly configurable and performant solution for managing Git hooks across multiple repositories. It supports both Ruby and JavaScript hooks and is particularly useful for monorepos or projects that require complex hook configurations.

  • pre-commit:

    Choose pre-commit if you are looking for a robust framework that supports a wide range of hooks and is language-agnostic. It allows you to define hooks in a configuration file and supports various programming languages, making it ideal for diverse projects.

README for husky

https://typicode.github.io/husky