Which is Better JavaScript Testing Frameworks?
jest vs mocha vs karma vs jasmine vs protractor
1 Year
jestmochakarmajasmineprotractorSimilar Packages:
What's JavaScript Testing Frameworks?

JavaScript testing frameworks are essential tools for developers to ensure the reliability and correctness of their code. They provide a structured environment for writing and executing tests, allowing developers to catch bugs early in the development process. Each framework has unique features and capabilities tailored to different testing needs, such as unit testing, integration testing, and end-to-end testing. By utilizing these frameworks, developers can improve code quality, facilitate refactoring, and enhance collaboration within teams, ultimately leading to more robust applications.

NPM Package Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
jest23,853,75244,1655.01 kB341a year agoMIT
mocha7,988,65622,5902.12 MB2092 months agoMIT
karma2,538,11711,954534 kB3803 months agoMIT
jasmine1,320,66537879.5 kB13 days agoMIT
protractor771,1978,749-6844 years agoMIT
Feature Comparison: jest vs mocha vs karma vs jasmine vs protractor

Testing Type

  • jest: Jest supports unit testing, integration testing, and snapshot testing. It is particularly effective for testing React components and provides a rich set of features to ensure comprehensive test coverage.
  • mocha: Mocha is a flexible framework that supports both unit and integration testing. It allows developers to choose their preferred assertion libraries and mocking tools, making it adaptable to different project needs.
  • karma: Karma is a test runner that facilitates unit testing across multiple browsers. It works with various testing frameworks, enabling developers to run their tests in real environments, which is crucial for cross-browser compatibility.
  • jasmine: Jasmine is primarily focused on unit testing and behavior-driven development (BDD). It allows developers to write clear and expressive tests that describe the expected behavior of their code, making it easier to understand and maintain.
  • protractor: Protractor is designed specifically for end-to-end testing of Angular applications. It provides a high-level API for simulating user interactions and testing the application as a whole.

Setup and Configuration

  • jest: Jest comes with a zero-config setup for most projects, making it easy to get started. It automatically finds tests and provides sensible defaults, reducing the need for extensive configuration.
  • mocha: Mocha offers flexibility in setup, allowing developers to configure it according to their needs. However, it may require additional libraries for assertions and mocking, which can complicate the initial setup.
  • karma: Karma requires more configuration compared to Jasmine and Jest. It needs to be set up with a configuration file specifying the testing framework, browsers, and other settings, which can be complex for beginners.
  • jasmine: Jasmine is straightforward to set up, requiring minimal configuration. It can be easily integrated into any JavaScript project without the need for additional dependencies.
  • protractor: Protractor requires specific configuration to work with Angular applications, including setting up a configuration file and ensuring that the Angular application is running. This can be more complex than other frameworks.

Mocking and Spying

  • jest: Jest includes powerful mocking capabilities out of the box, allowing developers to mock modules and functions seamlessly. This makes it easy to test components in isolation without relying on their actual implementations.
  • mocha: Mocha does not include built-in mocking tools, but it can be easily integrated with libraries like Sinon for mocking and spying. This allows for greater flexibility in how tests are structured.
  • karma: Karma does not provide built-in mocking capabilities, as it is primarily a test runner. Developers need to integrate other libraries like Sinon or Jasmine for mocking and spying functionalities.
  • jasmine: Jasmine has built-in support for spies, allowing developers to easily create mock functions and track their calls. This feature simplifies testing by enabling the isolation of components and their dependencies.
  • protractor: Protractor does not focus on mocking; instead, it simulates real user interactions with the application. For mocking, developers typically use other libraries in conjunction with Protractor.

Community and Ecosystem

  • jest: Jest has rapidly gained popularity, especially in the React community, and has a large ecosystem of plugins and extensions. Its active development and robust features make it a go-to choice for modern JavaScript applications.
  • mocha: Mocha has a long-standing presence in the JavaScript community and is widely adopted for various types of testing. Its flexibility and compatibility with other libraries contribute to its popularity.
  • karma: Karma is well-supported and integrates with many testing frameworks and tools. Its ability to run tests in real browsers makes it a valuable tool in the testing ecosystem.
  • jasmine: Jasmine has a strong community and is widely used in various JavaScript projects. Its simplicity and ease of use make it a popular choice among developers for unit testing.
  • protractor: Protractor is specifically tailored for Angular applications and has a dedicated community. However, its usage is more niche compared to other frameworks, which may limit its ecosystem.

Performance

  • jest: Jest is optimized for performance, featuring parallel test execution and intelligent test running, which significantly speeds up the testing process, especially in large applications.
  • mocha: Mocha's performance is generally good, but it may require additional configuration for optimal speed. It can be slower than Jest for larger test suites, especially when not using parallel execution.
  • karma: Karma's performance can vary depending on the number of browsers being tested. Running tests in multiple browsers can slow down the overall testing process, but it provides valuable cross-browser compatibility checks.
  • jasmine: Jasmine performs well for unit tests, but it may not be as fast as Jest for larger test suites due to its lack of parallel test execution.
  • protractor: Protractor can be slower than other testing frameworks due to its end-to-end testing nature, which involves more complex interactions and waits for Angular's execution flow.
How to Choose: jest vs mocha vs karma vs jasmine vs protractor
  • jest: Select Jest if you are looking for a comprehensive testing solution that includes a test runner, assertion library, and mocking capabilities out of the box. Jest is particularly well-suited for React applications and offers features like snapshot testing and parallel test execution, making it ideal for large codebases.
  • mocha: Choose Mocha if you prefer a flexible testing framework that allows you to structure your tests in a way that suits your project. Mocha supports asynchronous testing and can be easily integrated with other libraries for assertions and mocking, making it a versatile choice for various testing scenarios.
  • karma: Opt for Karma if you require a test runner that can execute tests across multiple real browsers. It is designed to work with any testing framework and is particularly useful for continuous integration environments where cross-browser testing is essential.
  • jasmine: Choose Jasmine if you need a behavior-driven development (BDD) framework that is simple to set up and use for unit testing JavaScript code. It is framework-agnostic and works well with any JavaScript project, providing a clean syntax for writing tests.
  • protractor: Select Protractor if you are focused on end-to-end testing for Angular applications. Protractor is built specifically for Angular and provides features like automatic synchronization with Angular's execution flow, making it easier to test complex user interactions.
README for jest

Jest

🃏 Delightful JavaScript Testing

  • 👩🏻‍💻 Developer Ready: Complete and ready to set-up JavaScript testing solution. Works out of the box for any React project.

  • 🏃🏽 Instant Feedback: Failed tests run first. Fast interactive mode can switch between running all tests or only test files related to changed files.

  • 📸 Snapshot Testing: Jest can capture snapshots of React trees or other serializable values to simplify UI testing.

Read More: https://jestjs.io/