jest vs mocha vs karma vs jasmine vs tape
JavaScript Testing Frameworks Comparison
1 Year
jestmochakarmajasminetapeSimilar Packages:
What's JavaScript Testing Frameworks?

JavaScript Testing Frameworks are tools that help developers write and run tests for their code to ensure it behaves as expected. These frameworks provide structures for organizing tests, running them automatically, and reporting results. They support various testing styles, including unit testing, integration testing, and end-to-end testing, and often include features like assertions, mocking, and code coverage analysis. Popular JavaScript testing frameworks include Jest, Mocha, Jasmine, and others, each with its unique features and strengths.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
jest26,689,18644,5715.01 kB337a year agoMIT
mocha9,243,78722,7162.13 MB1992 months agoMIT
karma2,900,43211,963534 kB3827 months agoMIT
jasmine1,505,40838079.8 kB024 days agoMIT
tape542,7055,781434 kB396 months agoMIT
Feature Comparison: jest vs mocha vs karma vs jasmine vs tape

Testing Style

  • jest:

    Jest supports both BDD and TDD (Test-Driven Development) styles, allowing developers to choose their preferred approach. It provides a rich API for writing tests, including support for asynchronous testing and custom matchers.

  • mocha:

    Mocha is a flexible testing framework that supports both BDD and TDD styles. It allows developers to structure tests using describe, it, and before/after hooks, providing great flexibility in how tests are organized.

  • karma:

    Karma is not a testing framework itself but a test runner that works with any framework. It allows you to run tests written in BDD, TDD, or any other style across multiple browsers.

  • jasmine:

    Jasmine is a behavior-driven development (BDD) framework that encourages writing tests in a descriptive manner. It uses describe and it functions to structure tests, making them easy to read and understand.

  • tape:

    Tape is a simple and straightforward testing framework that follows a more functional approach. It does not impose a specific style, making it easy to write tests quickly without boilerplate.

Mocking and Spying

  • jest:

    Jest is known for its powerful mocking capabilities. It includes a built-in mocking library that allows you to easily mock functions, modules, and timers. Jest also supports automatic mocking and provides a clear API for creating mock implementations.

  • mocha:

    Mocha does not include built-in mocking features, but it is compatible with any mocking library. You can use popular libraries like Sinon.js, Jest, or Mock.js alongside Mocha to add mocking functionality to your tests.

  • karma:

    Karma does not provide mocking features itself, but it integrates with any mocking library you choose to use. You can use frameworks like Sinon.js or Jest alongside Karma to add mocking capabilities to your tests.

  • jasmine:

    Jasmine has built-in support for mocking and spying on functions. It provides a simple API for creating spies, stubs, and mocks, allowing you to track function calls and control their behavior during tests.

  • tape:

    Tape does not provide built-in mocking or spying features. However, it is compatible with external mocking libraries like Sinon.js or Jest, allowing you to integrate mocking as needed.

Code Coverage

  • jest:

    Jest has built-in code coverage reporting out of the box. You can easily generate coverage reports by running tests with the --coverage flag, and Jest will automatically track coverage for all files.

  • mocha:

    Mocha does not include built-in code coverage reporting, but it can be integrated with coverage tools like Istanbul. You can use the nyc command-line tool to generate coverage reports for your Mocha tests.

  • karma:

    Karma does not provide code coverage reporting by default, but it can be integrated with coverage tools like Istanbul. You need to configure Karma to use a coverage reporter to generate coverage reports.

  • jasmine:

    Jasmine does not provide built-in code coverage reporting. However, you can integrate it with tools like Istanbul or Coveralls to generate coverage reports for your tests.

  • tape:

    Tape does not provide built-in code coverage reporting. However, you can use it in conjunction with coverage tools like Istanbul or nyc to generate coverage reports for your tests.

Asynchronous Testing

  • jest:

    Jest has excellent support for asynchronous testing, including callbacks, promises, and async/await. It also provides features like jest.runAllTimers() and jest.advanceTimersByTime() for testing code that uses timers.

  • mocha:

    Mocha supports asynchronous testing out of the box. You can use done callbacks, return promises, or use async/await to handle asynchronous code in your tests. Mocha will wait for the async operation to complete before moving on.

  • karma:

    Karma supports asynchronous testing with any framework you use. It allows you to run tests that involve asynchronous code, but the handling of async behavior depends on the framework you choose to integrate with Karma.

  • jasmine:

    Jasmine supports asynchronous testing using done callbacks, promises, and async/await. It provides a simple way to test asynchronous code while ensuring that tests wait for the expected behavior before completing.

  • tape:

    Tape supports asynchronous testing using callbacks, promises, and async/await. It allows you to write tests for async code while keeping the syntax simple and straightforward.

Ease of Use: Code Examples

  • jest:

    Example of Asynchronous Testing in Jest

    test('async test with promises', async () => {
      const data = await fetchData(); // Assume fetchData returns a promise
      expect(data).toBe('Hello, World!');
    });
    
  • mocha:

    Example of Asynchronous Testing in Mocha

    describe('Asynchronous Test', function() {
      it('should complete after a delay', function(done) {
        setTimeout(function() {
          expect(true).to.be.true;
          done(); // Signal that the async test is complete
        }, 1000);
      });
    });
    
  • karma:

    Example of Asynchronous Testing in Karma with Mocha

    describe('Asynchronous Test', function() {
      it('should complete after a delay', function(done) {
        setTimeout(function() {
          expect(true).to.be.true;
          done(); // Signal that the async test is complete
        }, 1000);
      });
    });
    
  • jasmine:

    Example of Asynchronous Testing in Jasmine

    describe('Asynchronous Test', function() {
      it('should complete after a delay', function(done) {
        setTimeout(function() {
          expect(true).toBe(true);
          done(); // Signal that the async test is complete
        }, 1000);
      });
    });
    
  • tape:

    Example of Asynchronous Testing in Tape

    const test = require('tape');
    
    test('async test', function(t) {
      setTimeout(function() {
        t.equal(true, true);
        t.end(); // Signal that the async test is complete
      }, 1000);
    });
    
How to Choose: jest vs mocha vs karma vs jasmine vs tape
  • jest:

    Choose Jest if you want a feature-rich testing framework that comes with built-in mocking, code coverage, and parallel test execution. It is particularly well-suited for testing React applications but works seamlessly with any JavaScript project.

  • mocha:

    Choose Mocha if you prefer a flexible and customizable testing framework that supports both BDD and TDD styles. It allows you to choose your assertion library and mocking tools, making it highly adaptable to different project needs.

  • karma:

    Choose Karma if you need a test runner that integrates with multiple testing frameworks and runs tests in real browsers. It is ideal for projects that require cross-browser testing and real-time feedback on test results.

  • jasmine:

    Choose Jasmine if you need a behavior-driven development (BDD) framework that is simple to set up and use. It has a clean syntax for writing tests and does not require a DOM, making it suitable for both front-end and back-end testing.

  • tape:

    Choose Tape if you want a minimalistic and straightforward testing framework that produces simple output without any configuration. It is great for small projects or when you want to keep your testing setup lightweight.

README for jest

Jest

🃏 Delightful JavaScript Testing

  • 👩🏻‍💻 Developer Ready: Complete and ready to set-up JavaScript testing solution. Works out of the box for any React project.

  • 🏃🏽 Instant Feedback: Failed tests run first. Fast interactive mode can switch between running all tests or only test files related to changed files.

  • 📸 Snapshot Testing: Jest can capture snapshots of React trees or other serializable values to simplify UI testing.

Read More: https://jestjs.io/