@tiptap/core vs quill vs slate
Rich Text Editor Architecture in Modern Web Apps
@tiptap/corequillslateSimilar Packages:

Rich Text Editor Architecture in Modern Web Apps

@tiptap/core, quill, and slate are leading solutions for building rich text editors, but they differ significantly in architecture and control. @tiptap/core is a headless wrapper around ProseMirror, offering robust collaboration features without UI components. quill is an opinionated editor with built-in themes and a stable Delta data format, focusing on ease of setup. slate is a completely customizable framework built for React, allowing developers to define their own data schema and behavior from the ground up.

Npm Package Weekly Downloads Trend

3 Years

Github Stars Ranking

Stat Detail

Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
@tiptap/core13,818,73438,8113.3 MB9118 days agoMIT
quill3,803,71047,3803.04 MB6632 years agoBSD-3-Clause
slate1,721,40231,7432.62 MB64 days agoMIT

Rich Text Editor Architecture: Tiptap vs Quill vs Slate

Building a rich text editor is one of the hardest tasks in frontend development. @tiptap/core, quill, and slate solve this problem differently. Each offers a distinct balance between control, ease of use, and data modeling. Let's compare how they handle core engineering challenges.

πŸ—οΈ Architecture & Control: Headless vs Opinionated vs Custom

@tiptap/core is headless.

  • It provides the logic but no UI components.
  • You build the toolbar and menus yourself.
  • Based on ProseMirror, ensuring robust behavior.
// tiptap: Headless setup
import { useEditor, EditorContent } from '@tiptap/react'
import StarterKit from '@tiptap/starter-kit'

const Editor = () => {
  const editor = useEditor({
    extensions: [StarterKit],
    content: '<p>Hello World</p>',
  })
  return <EditorContent editor={editor} />
}

quill is opinionated.

  • It includes a default toolbar and themes.
  • You configure modules rather than building from scratch.
  • Direct DOM manipulation under the hood.
// quill: Opinionated setup
import Quill from 'quill'
import 'quill/dist/quill.snow.css'

const editor = new Quill('#editor', {
  theme: 'snow',
  modules: { toolbar: true }
})

slate is fully custom.

  • You define the editor schema and nodes.
  • No default toolbar or behavior is included.
  • Requires significant boilerplate to start.
// slate: Custom setup
import { createEditor, withReact } from 'slate'
import { Slate, Editable } from 'slate-react'

const editor = withReact(createEditor())

const App = () => (
  <Slate editor={editor} initialValue={[{ type: 'paragraph', children: [{ text: '' }] }] }>
    <Editable />
  </Slate>
)

πŸ“¦ Data Model: HTML vs Delta vs Custom JSON

The way content is stored affects how you save and load data.

@tiptap/core supports HTML or JSON.

  • You can get content as HTML string or JSON nodes.
  • Flexible for backend storage preferences.
// tiptap: Get content
const html = editor.getHTML()
const json = editor.getJSON()

quill uses Delta format.

  • Content is an array of operations (insert, delete, retain).
  • Stable structure but requires parsing for plain HTML.
// quill: Get content
const delta = quill.getContents()
const html = quill.root.innerHTML

slate uses custom JSON nodes.

  • You define the shape of every node (paragraph, heading, etc).
  • Full control over data structure.
// slate: Get content
const value = editor.children
// Structure is defined by you, e.g., { type: 'paragraph', children: [...] }

🎨 UI & Theming: Build Your Own vs Built-In

Visual integration varies widely between these tools.

@tiptap/core requires custom UI.

  • You write buttons for bold, italic, etc.
  • Complete control over CSS and layout.
// tiptap: Custom button
<button onClick={() => editor.chain().focus().toggleBold().run()}>
  Bold
</button>

quill has built-in themes.

  • Use 'snow' or 'bubble' themes out of the box.
  • Limited customization without overriding CSS.
// quill: Built-in theme
new Quill('#editor', { theme: 'snow' })

slate requires custom UI.

  • You render every node type via React components.
  • Maximum flexibility for complex interfaces.
// slate: Custom node rendering
const renderElement = props => {
  switch (props.element.type) {
    case 'quote': return <blockquote {...props.attributes}>{props.children}</blockquote>
    default: return <p {...props.attributes}>{props.children}</p>
  }
}

βš›οΈ React Integration: Wrapper vs Native vs Core

Integration depth with React differs significantly.

@tiptap/core uses a React wrapper.

  • @tiptap/react provides hooks like useEditor.
  • Works well with React state but editor state is separate.
// tiptap: React hook
const { editor } = useEditor({ extensions: [Bold] })

quill often needs a wrapper library.

  • react-quill is commonly used for React projects.
  • Syncing React state with Quill state can be tricky.
// quill: React wrapper
import ReactQuill from 'react-quill'
<ReactQuill value={value} onChange={setValue} />

slate is built for React.

  • Uses React context and components natively.
  • Editor state lives within React render cycle.
// slate: Native React
const [value, setValue] = useState(initialValue)
<Slate editor={editor} initialValue={value} onChange={setValue}>

🀝 Similarities: Shared Ground

Despite differences, these libraries share common goals.

1. πŸ“ Rich Text Support

  • All support bold, italic, lists, and links.

2. πŸ”Œ Extensibility

  • All allow adding custom marks or nodes.

3. 🌐 Browser Compatibility

  • All target modern evergreen browsers.

4. πŸ“¦ Ecosystem

  • All have community plugins for extra features.

πŸ“Š Summary: Key Differences

Feature@tiptap/corequillslate
Architecture🧠 Headless (ProseMirror)πŸ–ΌοΈ Opinionated (DOM)🧩 Fully Custom (JSON)
Data FormatπŸ“„ HTML or JSONπŸ“ Delta OperationsπŸ—‚οΈ Custom JSON Nodes
UI Components🚫 None (Build your own)βœ… Built-in Themes🚫 None (Build your own)
Frameworkβš›οΈ React, Vue, Svelte🌐 Framework Agnosticβš›οΈ React Only
Setup Complexityβš™οΈ MediumπŸš€ LowπŸ› οΈ High

πŸ’‘ The Big Picture

@tiptap/core is like a high-performance engine 🏎️ β€” you get the power of ProseMirror without the legacy UI. Ideal for teams wanting modern framework support with robust editing logic.

quill is like a pre-furnished apartment 🏠 β€” ready to move in with standard tools. Perfect for standard forms, comments, or blogs where speed matters more than customization.

slate is like raw land and blueprints πŸ—οΈ β€” you build everything from the foundation. Best for unique products like Notion clones where the data model must be exact.

Final Thought: All three libraries solve the rich text problem but serve different architectural needs. Choose quill for speed, tiptap for balance, and slate for total control.

How to Choose: @tiptap/core vs quill vs slate

  • @tiptap/core:

    Choose @tiptap/core if you need a powerful, headless editor that supports multiple frameworks like Vue, React, or Svelte. It is ideal for projects requiring complex rich text features, collaboration, or strict control over the UI while leveraging the stability of ProseMirror.

  • quill:

    Choose quill if you want a stable, ready-to-use editor with minimal configuration and built-in themes. It is suitable for standard content input fields, comments, or blogs where you need a reliable Delta format for saving content without building custom toolbar logic.

  • slate:

    Choose slate if you are building a React-only application that requires a unique data model or behavior, such as a Notion-like interface. It is best for teams willing to invest time in building custom rendering and logic for maximum flexibility.

README for @tiptap/core

@tiptap/core

Version Downloads License Sponsor

Introduction

Tiptap is a headless wrapper around ProseMirror – a toolkit for building rich text WYSIWYG editors, which is already in use at many well-known companies such as New York Times, The Guardian or Atlassian.

Official Documentation

Documentation can be found on the Tiptap website.

License

Tiptap is open sourced software licensed under the MIT license.