slate vs @tiptap/core vs quill
Rich Text Editors
slate@tiptap/corequillSimilar Packages:

Rich Text Editors

Rich text editors are web-based text editing tools that allow users to format text, insert images, create lists, and perform other content editing tasks directly within a web application. Unlike simple text areas, rich text editors provide a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) interface, enabling users to see the formatting as they apply it. These editors are commonly used in content management systems, email clients, and any application that requires user-generated content with advanced formatting capabilities. They often support features like undo/redo, drag-and-drop file uploads, and customizable toolbars, making them versatile for both casual and professional users.

Npm Package Weekly Downloads Trend

3 Years

Github Stars Ranking

Stat Detail

Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
slate1,753,27631,5442.17 MB695a month agoMIT
@tiptap/core035,2612.29 MB8685 days agoMIT
quill046,8713.04 MB626a year agoBSD-3-Clause

Feature Comparison: slate vs @tiptap/core vs quill

Customization

  • slate:

    slate is the most customizable of the three, as it allows you to define the entire editor's behavior, structure, and rendering. You have complete control over how content is represented and edited, making it ideal for applications that require unique or complex editing features.

  • @tiptap/core:

    @tiptap/core offers extensive customization through its plugin-based architecture. You can easily create custom nodes, marks, and commands, and integrate third-party plugins as needed. This flexibility allows for a highly tailored editing experience.

  • quill:

    quill provides a good level of customization, especially for its toolbar and formatting options. You can create custom blot components and extend the editor's functionality, but it may not be as flexible as @tiptap/core or slate for deep customizations.

Architecture

  • slate:

    slate is designed as a headless framework, meaning it provides the building blocks for creating an editor without imposing any specific UI or behavior. This allows developers to implement their own rendering logic and user interactions, resulting in a highly flexible and performant editing experience.

  • @tiptap/core:

    @tiptap/core is built on top of ProseMirror, leveraging its powerful editing capabilities while providing a more developer-friendly API. It follows a modular architecture, allowing you to include only the features you need, which helps keep the bundle size small.

  • quill:

    quill has a well-defined architecture with a focus on performance and extensibility. It uses a delta-based approach for handling content, which makes it efficient for both editing and rendering. The editor is designed to be fast and responsive, even with large amounts of content.

Community and Ecosystem

  • slate:

    slate has a passionate community of developers, particularly those focused on building highly customized editing experiences. While it may not be as large as the communities for quill or @tiptap/core, it is active and supportive, with a growing number of plugins and resources.

  • @tiptap/core:

    @tiptap/core has a growing community and ecosystem, with a focus on modern web development practices. Its integration with ProseMirror and active development make it a popular choice for projects that require a customizable and feature-rich editor.

  • quill:

    quill has a large and established community, with many resources, plugins, and themes available. It is widely used in various applications, which contributes to its stability and reliability as a rich text editor.

Performance

  • slate:

    slate performance is highly dependent on how you implement the editor, as it gives you complete control over rendering and state management. With careful optimization, slate can handle complex editing tasks efficiently, but it may require more work to ensure performance compared to the other two editors.

  • @tiptap/core:

    @tiptap/core offers good performance, especially for applications that use ProseMirror's efficient editing model. However, performance can vary depending on how many features and plugins are used, so it's important to optimize the editor for your specific use case.

  • quill:

    quill is known for its performance, particularly with its delta-based approach to handling content. It performs well with large documents and provides smooth editing experiences, making it suitable for most web applications.

Ease of Use: Code Examples

  • slate:

    slate has a steeper learning curve due to its headless nature and the need for developers to implement their own rendering and editing logic. However, its flexibility allows for the creation of highly customized editing experiences. Example of slate:

    import { Slate, Editable, useSlate } from 'slate-react';
    import { createEditor } from 'slate';
    
    const editor = createEditor();
    
    const App = () => (
      <Slate editor={editor} value={initialValue} onChange={value => {}}>
        <Editable />
      </Slate>
    );
    
  • @tiptap/core:

    @tiptap/core is designed to be developer-friendly, with clear documentation and examples. Its modular nature makes it easy to understand and integrate into projects, especially for developers familiar with ProseMirror. Example of @tiptap/core:

    import { Editor } from '@tiptap/core';
    import StarterKit from '@tiptap/starter-kit';
    
    const editor = new Editor({
      content: '<p>Hello World!</p>',
      extensions: [StarterKit],
      onUpdate: ({ editor }) => {
        console.log(editor.getHTML());
      },
    });
    
  • quill:

    quill provides a straightforward API and good documentation, making it easy for developers to implement and customize the editor. Its built-in toolbar and formatting features are intuitive for users. Example of quill:

    <div id="editor"></div>
    <script src="https://cdn.quilljs.com/1.3.6/quill.js"></script>
    <link href="https://cdn.quilljs.com/1.3.6/quill.snow.css" rel="stylesheet">
    <script>
      const quill = new Quill('#editor', {
        theme: 'snow',
        modules: {
          toolbar: [['bold', 'italic', 'underline'], ['link', 'image']],
        },
      });
    </script>
    

How to Choose: slate vs @tiptap/core vs quill

  • slate:

    Choose slate if you require complete control over the editor's behavior and structure. It is a headless editor framework that allows you to build your own editing experience from the ground up, making it ideal for applications with unique requirements or those that need to implement complex editing features.

  • @tiptap/core:

    Choose @tiptap/core if you need a highly customizable and modern rich text editor built on top of ProseMirror. It offers a modular architecture, allowing you to pick and choose features as needed, and is designed for developers who want to create a tailored editing experience.

  • quill:

    Choose quill if you want a feature-rich, open-source editor that provides a good balance between customization and ease of use. It comes with a built-in toolbar, supports themes, and is suitable for applications that need a reliable editor with good performance and a straightforward API.

README for slate

This package contains the core logic of Slate. Feel free to poke around to learn more!

Note: A number of source files contain extracted types for Interfaces or Transforms. This is done currently to enable custom type extensions as found in packages/src/interfaces/custom-types.ts.