fs-extra vs ncp vs copyfiles vs cpx
File Copying Utilities in Node.js Comparison
1 Year
fs-extrancpcopyfilescpxSimilar Packages:
What's File Copying Utilities in Node.js?

File copying utilities in Node.js are essential tools that simplify the process of copying files and directories within a project. They provide various functionalities to handle file operations efficiently, ensuring that developers can automate tasks related to file management without delving into the complexities of the Node.js file system module. These packages vary in features, performance, and ease of use, catering to different needs in the development workflow.

Package Weekly Downloads Trend
Github Stars Ranking
Stat Detail
Package
Downloads
Stars
Size
Issues
Publish
License
fs-extra104,434,2429,52355.3 kB15a month agoMIT
ncp3,537,679683-8110 years agoMIT
copyfiles1,257,931414-554 years agoMIT
cpx255,647527-358 years agoMIT
Feature Comparison: fs-extra vs ncp vs copyfiles vs cpx

Ease of Use

  • fs-extra:

    fs-extra enhances the native fs module, providing a familiar API while adding convenience methods for file operations. Its seamless integration with existing Node.js code makes it easy to adopt without a steep learning curve.

  • ncp:

    ncp is designed for simplicity, focusing solely on copying directories. Its minimalistic approach makes it easy to use for straightforward tasks, requiring little setup or configuration.

  • copyfiles:

    copyfiles offers a simple command-line interface that allows users to specify source and destination paths easily, along with glob patterns for file selection. This makes it user-friendly for quick copying tasks without extensive configuration.

  • cpx:

    cpx provides an intuitive command-line interface with options for watching files and directories. Its straightforward syntax allows developers to set up file copying with minimal effort, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced users.

Functionality

  • fs-extra:

    fs-extra provides a wide range of file system methods, including copy, move, remove, and ensureFile. This comprehensive functionality makes it suitable for complex file management tasks beyond simple copying.

  • ncp:

    ncp focuses on recursively copying directories, ensuring that all files and subdirectories are included in the operation. It is efficient for tasks that require duplication of entire directory structures.

  • copyfiles:

    copyfiles supports glob patterns, allowing for flexible file selection based on naming conventions. It can copy multiple files and directories in a single command, making it versatile for various use cases.

  • cpx:

    cpx not only copies files but also watches for changes in the source files, automatically copying them to the destination. This feature is particularly useful in development environments where files are frequently updated.

Performance

  • fs-extra:

    fs-extra is built on top of the native fs module, ensuring good performance for file operations. Its additional methods are optimized for common tasks, making it a reliable choice for performance-sensitive applications.

  • ncp:

    ncp is lightweight and optimized for directory copying, providing good performance for recursive operations. However, it may not offer the same level of optimization as more comprehensive libraries for complex file management tasks.

  • copyfiles:

    copyfiles is optimized for speed in copying files, especially when dealing with multiple files. However, it may not be as efficient for large directory structures due to its reliance on the underlying file system operations.

  • cpx:

    cpx is designed for performance in development workflows, efficiently copying files and minimizing overhead when watching for changes. Its ability to handle incremental updates makes it suitable for rapid development cycles.

Use Cases

  • fs-extra:

    fs-extra is best suited for applications that require extensive file manipulation, such as build tools, deployment scripts, or any project that needs robust file management capabilities.

  • ncp:

    ncp is well-suited for straightforward tasks like copying static assets or templates. Its focus on directory copying makes it a good choice for projects that need to duplicate folder structures.

  • copyfiles:

    copyfiles is ideal for quick tasks such as copying build artifacts or assets in a project. Its simplicity makes it suitable for use in npm scripts for automation during build processes.

  • cpx:

    cpx is perfect for development environments where files need to be synchronized frequently. It is particularly useful for projects that require live reloading or automatic updates during development.

Community and Support

  • fs-extra:

    fs-extra has a large and active community, with extensive documentation and examples available. This support makes it a reliable choice for developers looking for help or resources.

  • ncp:

    ncp has a smaller user base but is straightforward enough that users can typically find solutions to common issues through its documentation or community forums.

  • copyfiles:

    copyfiles has a smaller community compared to some other file utilities, but it is actively maintained and provides basic documentation for users to get started quickly.

  • cpx:

    cpx has a growing community and is well-documented, making it easier for users to find support and examples for common use cases, especially in development environments.

How to Choose: fs-extra vs ncp vs copyfiles vs cpx
  • fs-extra:

    Select fs-extra if you need a comprehensive file system utility that extends the native fs module with additional methods for copying, removing, and manipulating files and directories. It is perfect for projects that require extensive file operations and additional features like JSON file handling.

  • ncp:

    Use ncp if you need a simple and efficient way to copy directories recursively. It is lightweight and focuses solely on copying, making it a good choice for straightforward directory copying tasks.

  • copyfiles:

    Choose copyfiles if you need a simple and straightforward command-line tool for copying files and directories with glob patterns. It is particularly useful for quick tasks and integrates well with npm scripts.

  • cpx:

    Opt for cpx if you require a more robust solution that supports watching files for changes and automatically copying them. It is ideal for development environments where files need to be synchronized frequently.

README for fs-extra

Node.js: fs-extra

fs-extra adds file system methods that aren't included in the native fs module and adds promise support to the fs methods. It also uses graceful-fs to prevent EMFILE errors. It should be a drop in replacement for fs.

npm Package License build status downloads per month JavaScript Style Guide

Why?

I got tired of including mkdirp, rimraf, and ncp in most of my projects.

Installation

npm install fs-extra

Usage

CommonJS

fs-extra is a drop in replacement for native fs. All methods in fs are attached to fs-extra. All fs methods return promises if the callback isn't passed.

You don't ever need to include the original fs module again:

const fs = require('fs') // this is no longer necessary

you can now do this:

const fs = require('fs-extra')

or if you prefer to make it clear that you're using fs-extra and not fs, you may want to name your fs variable fse like so:

const fse = require('fs-extra')

you can also keep both, but it's redundant:

const fs = require('fs')
const fse = require('fs-extra')

ESM

There is also an fs-extra/esm import, that supports both default and named exports. However, note that fs methods are not included in fs-extra/esm; you still need to import fs and/or fs/promises seperately:

import { readFileSync } from 'fs'
import { readFile } from 'fs/promises'
import { outputFile, outputFileSync } from 'fs-extra/esm'

Default exports are supported:

import fs from 'fs'
import fse from 'fs-extra/esm'
// fse.readFileSync is not a function; must use fs.readFileSync

but you probably want to just use regular fs-extra instead of fs-extra/esm for default exports:

import fs from 'fs-extra'
// both fs and fs-extra methods are defined

Sync vs Async vs Async/Await

Most methods are async by default. All async methods will return a promise if the callback isn't passed.

Sync methods on the other hand will throw if an error occurs.

Also Async/Await will throw an error if one occurs.

Example:

const fs = require('fs-extra')

// Async with promises:
fs.copy('/tmp/myfile', '/tmp/mynewfile')
  .then(() => console.log('success!'))
  .catch(err => console.error(err))

// Async with callbacks:
fs.copy('/tmp/myfile', '/tmp/mynewfile', err => {
  if (err) return console.error(err)
  console.log('success!')
})

// Sync:
try {
  fs.copySync('/tmp/myfile', '/tmp/mynewfile')
  console.log('success!')
} catch (err) {
  console.error(err)
}

// Async/Await:
async function copyFiles () {
  try {
    await fs.copy('/tmp/myfile', '/tmp/mynewfile')
    console.log('success!')
  } catch (err) {
    console.error(err)
  }
}

copyFiles()

Methods

Async

Sync

NOTE: You can still use the native Node.js methods. They are promisified and copied over to fs-extra. See notes on fs.read(), fs.write(), & fs.writev()

What happened to walk() and walkSync()?

They were removed from fs-extra in v2.0.0. If you need the functionality, walk and walkSync are available as separate packages, klaw and klaw-sync.

Third Party

CLI

fse-cli allows you to run fs-extra from a console or from npm scripts.

TypeScript

If you like TypeScript, you can use fs-extra with it: https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/tree/master/types/fs-extra

File / Directory Watching

If you want to watch for changes to files or directories, then you should use chokidar.

Obtain Filesystem (Devices, Partitions) Information

fs-filesystem allows you to read the state of the filesystem of the host on which it is run. It returns information about both the devices and the partitions (volumes) of the system.

Misc.

Hacking on fs-extra

Wanna hack on fs-extra? Great! Your help is needed! fs-extra is one of the most depended upon Node.js packages. This project uses JavaScript Standard Style - if the name or style choices bother you, you're gonna have to get over it :) If standard is good enough for npm, it's good enough for fs-extra.

js-standard-style

What's needed?

  • First, take a look at existing issues. Those are probably going to be where the priority lies.
  • More tests for edge cases. Specifically on different platforms. There can never be enough tests.
  • Improve test coverage.

Note: If you make any big changes, you should definitely file an issue for discussion first.

Running the Test Suite

fs-extra contains hundreds of tests.

  • npm run lint: runs the linter (standard)
  • npm run unit: runs the unit tests
  • npm run unit-esm: runs tests for fs-extra/esm exports
  • npm test: runs the linter and all tests

When running unit tests, set the environment variable CROSS_DEVICE_PATH to the absolute path of an empty directory on another device (like a thumb drive) to enable cross-device move tests.

Windows

If you run the tests on the Windows and receive a lot of symbolic link EPERM permission errors, it's because on Windows you need elevated privilege to create symbolic links. You can add this to your Windows's account by following the instructions here: http://superuser.com/questions/104845/permission-to-make-symbolic-links-in-windows-7 However, I didn't have much luck doing this.

Since I develop on Mac OS X, I use VMWare Fusion for Windows testing. I create a shared folder that I map to a drive on Windows. I open the Node.js command prompt and run as Administrator. I then map the network drive running the following command:

net use z: "\\vmware-host\Shared Folders"

I can then navigate to my fs-extra directory and run the tests.

Naming

I put a lot of thought into the naming of these functions. Inspired by @coolaj86's request. So he deserves much of the credit for raising the issue. See discussion(s) here:

  • https://github.com/jprichardson/node-fs-extra/issues/2
  • https://github.com/flatiron/utile/issues/11
  • https://github.com/ryanmcgrath/wrench-js/issues/29
  • https://github.com/substack/node-mkdirp/issues/17

First, I believe that in as many cases as possible, the Node.js naming schemes should be chosen. However, there are problems with the Node.js own naming schemes.

For example, fs.readFile() and fs.readdir(): the F is capitalized in File and the d is not capitalized in dir. Perhaps a bit pedantic, but they should still be consistent. Also, Node.js has chosen a lot of POSIX naming schemes, which I believe is great. See: fs.mkdir(), fs.rmdir(), fs.chown(), etc.

We have a dilemma though. How do you consistently name methods that perform the following POSIX commands: cp, cp -r, mkdir -p, and rm -rf?

My perspective: when in doubt, err on the side of simplicity. A directory is just a hierarchical grouping of directories and files. Consider that for a moment. So when you want to copy it or remove it, in most cases you'll want to copy or remove all of its contents. When you want to create a directory, if the directory that it's suppose to be contained in does not exist, then in most cases you'll want to create that too.

So, if you want to remove a file or a directory regardless of whether it has contents, just call fs.remove(path). If you want to copy a file or a directory whether it has contents, just call fs.copy(source, destination). If you want to create a directory regardless of whether its parent directories exist, just call fs.mkdirs(path) or fs.mkdirp(path).

Credit

fs-extra wouldn't be possible without using the modules from the following authors:

License

Licensed under MIT

Copyright (c) 2011-2024 JP Richardson